| Important Message - Daily Racing Form/Affinity Gaming will be permanently shutting down StatFox on 6/30/2024. |
| Valued StatFox Customers: We are thrilled to refer you to our friends at StatSharp, launching just in time for the 2024 football season! As StatFox closes its doors, we encourage you to bookmark www.statsharp.com and stay tuned for their launch. StatSharp's cutting-edge platform will offer power ratings, game simulations, betting systems, in-depth trends for teams and player, and much more to elevate your sports betting experience. Discover the advanced insights and analytics at StatSharp, with even more precision and innovation.
|
|
The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
NEVADA Wolf Pack25-7 |
|
|
| Last 20 Games for the 2004-2005 Season |
| Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
|
March 2005 |
|
3-19-05 |
vs ILLINOIS |
+11.5 |
130 |
59-71 |
L |
L |
P |
37.0% |
33.3% |
64.0% |
32 |
53.1% |
16.7% |
85.0% |
32 |
|
3-17-05 |
vs TEXAS |
+1.5 |
134 |
61-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
37.1% |
21.4% |
66.7% |
49 |
35.3% |
50.0% |
66.7% |
43 |
|
3-10-05 |
vs BOISE ST |
-15.5 |
138 |
72-73 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.2% |
14.3% |
65.4% |
43 |
44.6% |
45.0% |
75.0% |
37 |
|
3-5-05 |
at SAN JOSE ST |
-13 |
126 |
73-69 |
W |
L |
Ov |
47.3% |
20.0% |
69.0% |
40 |
47.5% |
30.0% |
70.0% |
26 |
|
3-3-05 |
at HAWAII |
-1.5 |
134 |
55-47 |
W |
W |
Un |
36.7% |
0.0% |
79.2% |
46 |
29.4% |
13.6% |
44.4% |
33 |
|
February 2005 |
|
2-26-05 |
at FRESNO ST |
-5 |
132 |
76-63 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.9% |
42.9% |
83.3% |
38 |
32.1% |
18.8% |
82.8% |
32 |
|
2-21-05 |
vs TULSA |
-12 |
133.5 |
70-56 |
W |
W |
Un |
44.1% |
22.2% |
84.2% |
48 |
30.8% |
41.2% |
69.2% |
35 |
|
2-19-05 |
vs VERMONT |
NL |
NL |
74-64 |
W |
- |
- |
45.3% |
33.3% |
74.2% |
36 |
42.4% |
29.6% |
54.5% |
37 |
|
2-16-05 |
vs RICE |
-8 |
137 |
73-58 |
W |
W |
Un |
57.7% |
25.0% |
75.0% |
28 |
43.9% |
44.4% |
100.0% |
28 |
|
2-12-05 |
at UTEP |
+5.5 |
140 |
62-60 |
W |
W |
Un |
47.7% |
63.6% |
68.4% |
30 |
37.0% |
30.8% |
88.9% |
30 |
|
2-10-05 |
at BOISE ST |
-7 |
139 |
67-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
41.3% |
10.0% |
77.8% |
39 |
36.7% |
28.6% |
33.3% |
41 |
|
2-5-05 |
vs LOUISIANA TECH |
-7.5 |
131 |
76-58 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.9% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
40 |
36.4% |
28.6% |
69.6% |
30 |
|
2-3-05 |
vs SMU |
-10 |
131 |
73-59 |
W |
W |
Ov |
51.1% |
22.2% |
60.5% |
41 |
41.1% |
40.0% |
47.4% |
31 |
|
January 2005 |
|
1-29-05 |
vs FRESNO ST |
-10 |
134.5 |
63-66 |
L |
L |
Un |
44.4% |
10.0% |
68.8% |
37 |
42.3% |
50.0% |
58.3% |
30 |
|
1-22-05 |
at RICE |
+4 |
144 |
62-59 |
W |
W |
Un |
41.5% |
27.3% |
55.6% |
46 |
37.5% |
19.0% |
68.4% |
31 |
|
1-20-05 |
at TULSA |
-3.5 |
140 |
75-69 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.1% |
25.0% |
71.9% |
34 |
50.9% |
25.0% |
62.5% |
27 |
|
1-15-05 |
vs BOISE ST |
-15 |
141.5 |
84-66 |
W |
W |
Ov |
46.0% |
35.7% |
80.8% |
44 |
39.7% |
22.7% |
71.4% |
29 |
|
1-12-05 |
vs UTEP |
-1 |
142.5 |
80-83 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.6% |
25.0% |
63.0% |
42 |
49.1% |
50.0% |
91.3% |
36 |
|
1-8-05 |
at SMU |
+3 |
132.5 |
73-66 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
25.0% |
80.0% |
38 |
43.3% |
33.3% |
71.4% |
22 |
|
1-6-05 |
at LOUISIANA TECH |
+2 |
130 |
64-56 |
W |
W |
Un |
43.1% |
20.0% |
72.0% |
40 |
34.5% |
33.3% |
60.0% |
36 |
|
|
Game Situation Report for the 2004-2005 Season Season |
|
32 |
25-7 (78.1%) |
18-11-0 (62.1%) |
12-14-1 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
69.5 |
61.7 |
+7.8 |
|
17 |
13-4 (76.5%) |
8-7-0 (53.3%) |
7-6-0 |
53.8% |
46.2% |
73.7 |
60.8 |
+12.9 |
|
13 |
11-2 (84.6%) |
9-3-0 (75.0%) |
5-7-0 |
41.7% |
58.3% |
65.5 |
62.5 |
+3.1 |
|
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-1 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
60.0 |
64.0 |
-4.0 |
|
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
75.8 |
52.8 |
+23.0 |
|
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-1 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
60.0 |
64.0 |
-4.0 |
|
19 |
16-3 (84.2%) |
13-6-0 (68.4%) |
9-10-0 |
47.4% |
52.6% |
69.8 |
61.8 |
+7.9 |
|
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
3-4-1 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
69.2 |
61.5 |
+7.7 |
|
21 |
17-4 (81.0%) |
13-8-0 (61.9%) |
10-9-0 |
52.6% |
47.4% |
71.2 |
61.4 |
+9.8 |
|
8 |
5-3 (62.5%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
2-5-1 |
28.6% |
71.4% |
63.5 |
67.1 |
-3.6 |
|
15 |
11-4 (73.3%) |
8-7-0 (53.3%) |
7-6-0 |
53.8% |
46.2% |
72.7 |
62.5 |
+10.3 |
|
6 |
6-0 (100.0%) |
5-1-0 (83.3%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
67.3 |
58.7 |
+8.7 |
|
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
2-4-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
64.7 |
68.2 |
-3.5 |
|
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
79.5 |
56.0 |
+23.5 |
|
8 |
7-1 (87.5%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
3-4-1 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
66.6 |
61.8 |
+4.9 |
|
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
71.3 |
74.5 |
-3.3 |
|
18 |
14-4 (77.8%) |
10-6-0 (62.5%) |
7-9-0 |
43.8% |
56.3% |
69.3 |
59.4 |
+9.9 |
|
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
79.5 |
56.0 |
+23.5 |
|
25 |
19-6 (76.0%) |
14-9-0 (60.9%) |
8-12-1 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
68.2 |
62.5 |
+5.7 |
|
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
4-2-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
71.8 |
63.0 |
+8.8 |
|
18 |
13-5 (72.2%) |
10-6-0 (62.5%) |
7-8-1 |
46.7% |
53.3% |
67.4 |
64.2 |
+3.2 |
|
10 |
8-2 (80.0%) |
6-4-0 (60.0%) |
5-4-0 |
55.6% |
44.4% |
70.8 |
61.9 |
+8.9 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
