The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAKE FOREST Demon Deacons8-24 |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2010-2011 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2011 |
3-10-11 |
vs BOSTON COLLEGE |
+12.5 |
142 |
67-81 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.5% |
31.3% |
57.1% |
29 |
53.7% |
40.0% |
65.0% |
38 |
3-6-11 |
at BOSTON COLLEGE |
+17 |
145 |
66-84 |
L |
L |
Ov |
50.0% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
25 |
58.2% |
54.5% |
61.5% |
28 |
3-3-11 |
vs GEORGIA TECH |
+6.5 |
142.5 |
54-80 |
L |
L |
Un |
32.6% |
26.7% |
69.0% |
27 |
44.4% |
42.1% |
64.0% |
44 |
February 2011 |
2-26-11 |
at CLEMSON |
+19.5 |
136.5 |
49-63 |
L |
W |
Un |
33.9% |
16.7% |
63.6% |
38 |
43.4% |
33.3% |
68.8% |
37 |
2-22-11 |
vs VIRGINIA TECH |
+14 |
143.5 |
62-76 |
L |
P |
Un |
42.4% |
16.7% |
75.0% |
23 |
60.0% |
66.7% |
63.6% |
35 |
2-19-11 |
vs FLORIDA ST |
+11.5 |
140 |
66-84 |
L |
L |
Ov |
32.8% |
17.6% |
75.8% |
37 |
44.8% |
22.2% |
80.0% |
41 |
2-15-11 |
at N CAROLINA |
+23 |
155 |
64-78 |
L |
W |
Un |
37.7% |
40.0% |
100.0% |
35 |
36.6% |
18.5% |
75.0% |
50 |
2-13-11 |
vs NC STATE |
+5.5 |
147 |
55-80 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.9% |
27.3% |
83.3% |
26 |
55.9% |
40.0% |
71.4% |
36 |
2-9-11 |
vs MIAMI |
+8 |
144.5 |
73-74 |
L |
W |
Ov |
53.8% |
41.7% |
78.8% |
21 |
46.9% |
35.0% |
77.8% |
29 |
2-5-11 |
at MARYLAND |
+20.5 |
149 |
70-91 |
L |
L |
Ov |
45.6% |
58.3% |
84.6% |
33 |
46.1% |
47.1% |
76.5% |
39 |
2-1-11 |
at FLORIDA ST |
+19 |
135 |
61-85 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.6% |
36.0% |
42.9% |
33 |
41.7% |
37.0% |
60.0% |
47 |
January 2011 |
1-29-11 |
vs VIRGINIA |
+4 |
132 |
76-71 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.0% |
47.4% |
90.5% |
27 |
50.0% |
40.0% |
50.0% |
31 |
1-22-11 |
vs DUKE |
+22.5 |
153 |
59-83 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.2% |
43.8% |
71.4% |
34 |
42.6% |
34.6% |
84.6% |
38 |
1-19-11 |
at GEORGIA TECH |
+14.5 |
148 |
39-74 |
L |
L |
Un |
25.9% |
13.3% |
34.6% |
39 |
41.3% |
50.0% |
60.9% |
50 |
1-15-11 |
at VIRGINIA TECH |
+19 |
140 |
65-94 |
L |
L |
Ov |
40.0% |
33.3% |
85.7% |
23 |
58.6% |
47.1% |
85.7% |
30 |
1-12-11 |
vs MARYLAND |
+14 |
149 |
55-74 |
L |
L |
Un |
31.7% |
25.0% |
73.7% |
42 |
38.2% |
27.8% |
51.5% |
52 |
1-8-11 |
at NC STATE |
+13 |
147 |
69-90 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.4% |
21.4% |
84.2% |
22 |
51.5% |
50.0% |
89.5% |
47 |
1-5-11 |
vs HIGH POINT |
NL |
NL |
79-63 |
W |
- |
- |
49.1% |
29.4% |
84.6% |
31 |
37.7% |
31.3% |
64.3% |
34 |
1-2-11 |
vs GONZAGA |
+10 |
150.5 |
63-73 |
L |
P |
Un |
33.9% |
23.5% |
77.8% |
29 |
50.0% |
33.3% |
81.8% |
40 |
December 2010 |
12-29-10 |
at RICHMOND |
+16.5 |
138 |
74-90 |
L |
W |
Ov |
40.0% |
46.7% |
90.5% |
36 |
50.0% |
43.5% |
88.9% |
37 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2010-2011 Season Season |
32 |
8-24 (25.0%) |
9-17-2 (34.6%) |
16-11-1 |
59.3% |
40.7% |
67.2 |
77.2 |
-10.0 |
19 |
7-12 (36.8%) |
4-9-2 (30.8%) |
6-8-1 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
68.0 |
73.9 |
-5.9 |
10 |
0-10 (0.0%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
7-3-0 |
70.0% |
30.0% |
63.2 |
83.2 |
-20.0 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
3-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
75.0 |
77.3 |
-2.3 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
1-4-0 (20.0%) |
3-1-1 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
70.8 |
73.8 |
-3.0 |
17 |
1-16 (5.9%) |
4-12-1 (25.0%) |
9-8-0 |
52.9% |
47.1% |
61.8 |
80.1 |
-18.4 |
15 |
7-8 (46.7%) |
5-5-1 (50.0%) |
7-3-1 |
70.0% |
30.0% |
73.3 |
73.8 |
-0.5 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
3-2-1 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
74.2 |
69.3 |
+4.8 |
22 |
2-20 (9.1%) |
7-13-2 (35.0%) |
13-9-0 |
59.1% |
40.9% |
64.0 |
80.5 |
-16.5 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
1-3-0 (25.0%) |
1-2-1 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
71.8 |
66.3 |
+5.5 |
11 |
2-9 (18.2%) |
3-6-2 (33.3%) |
5-6-0 |
45.5% |
54.5% |
64.4 |
78.0 |
-13.6 |
10 |
0-10 (0.0%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
7-3-0 |
70.0% |
30.0% |
63.2 |
83.2 |
-20.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-0-1 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
75.0 |
74.5 |
+0.5 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
69.0 |
80.5 |
-11.5 |
11 |
3-8 (27.3%) |
1-7-1 (12.5%) |
5-4-0 |
55.6% |
44.4% |
66.5 |
77.0 |
-10.5 |
17 |
4-13 (23.5%) |
6-8-1 (42.9%) |
9-6-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
66.4 |
77.2 |
-10.8 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-0-1 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
75.0 |
74.5 |
+0.5 |
8 |
2-6 (25.0%) |
2-5-0 (28.6%) |
7-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.0 |
81.1 |
-10.1 |
23 |
6-17 (26.1%) |
7-12-2 (36.8%) |
9-11-1 |
45.0% |
55.0% |
65.3 |
75.3 |
-10.0 |
9 |
2-7 (22.2%) |
1-5-1 (16.7%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
65.3 |
76.4 |
-11.1 |
16 |
4-12 (25.0%) |
6-9-1 (40.0%) |
9-6-1 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
67.4 |
78.1 |
-10.6 |
|
|
|
| |
|