The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TENNESSEE Volunteers19-15 |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2011-2012 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2012 |
3-19-12 |
vs MIDDLE TENN ST |
-3.5 |
134.5 |
64-71 |
L |
L |
Ov |
37.9% |
7.7% |
63.3% |
30 |
46.2% |
27.3% |
71.4% |
46 |
3-13-12 |
vs SAVANNAH ST |
-12.5 |
123.5 |
65-51 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.0% |
40.0% |
70.4% |
42 |
32.8% |
20.0% |
42.9% |
41 |
3-9-12 |
vs OLE MISS |
-3.5 |
125 |
72-77 |
L |
L |
Ov |
28.1% |
32.4% |
75.8% |
49 |
42.2% |
50.0% |
67.7% |
41 |
3-3-12 |
vs VANDERBILT |
+1 |
136.5 |
68-61 |
W |
W |
Un |
43.8% |
18.8% |
79.3% |
40 |
39.0% |
33.3% |
50.0% |
30 |
February 2012 |
2-29-12 |
at LSU |
+1.5 |
126 |
74-69 |
W |
W |
Ov |
51.0% |
55.6% |
86.4% |
29 |
42.9% |
38.5% |
69.6% |
32 |
2-25-12 |
at S CAROLINA |
-2.5 |
125.5 |
73-64 |
W |
W |
Ov |
52.2% |
50.0% |
72.0% |
38 |
32.4% |
31.6% |
73.7% |
32 |
2-22-12 |
vs OLE MISS |
-7 |
128 |
73-60 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.6% |
29.4% |
69.2% |
40 |
44.6% |
27.3% |
58.3% |
28 |
2-18-12 |
at ALABAMA |
+4 |
121 |
50-62 |
L |
L |
Un |
34.1% |
20.0% |
66.7% |
31 |
37.0% |
27.8% |
76.7% |
37 |
2-15-12 |
vs ARKANSAS |
-8 |
136.5 |
77-58 |
W |
W |
Un |
56.0% |
47.8% |
58.8% |
30 |
42.9% |
25.0% |
70.0% |
31 |
2-11-12 |
at FLORIDA |
+12 |
133 |
75-70 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.0% |
45.5% |
64.7% |
36 |
43.5% |
37.9% |
67.9% |
30 |
2-8-12 |
vs S CAROLINA |
-7 |
122 |
69-57 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
50.0% |
80.8% |
34 |
33.9% |
43.8% |
63.2% |
30 |
2-4-12 |
vs GEORGIA |
-7.5 |
120 |
73-62 |
W |
W |
Ov |
45.2% |
31.8% |
75.7% |
34 |
36.4% |
46.7% |
75.0% |
30 |
January 2012 |
1-31-12 |
at KENTUCKY |
+15.5 |
132 |
44-69 |
L |
L |
Un |
28.1% |
38.9% |
71.4% |
29 |
53.7% |
10.0% |
88.9% |
34 |
1-28-12 |
vs AUBURN |
-8.5 |
119.5 |
64-49 |
W |
W |
Un |
34.5% |
20.0% |
80.0% |
53 |
30.4% |
31.3% |
66.7% |
30 |
1-24-12 |
at VANDERBILT |
+9 |
130 |
47-65 |
L |
L |
Un |
35.3% |
10.0% |
71.4% |
40 |
42.6% |
44.4% |
64.7% |
32 |
1-21-12 |
vs CONNECTICUT |
+3 |
128 |
60-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.3% |
33.3% |
47.6% |
37 |
36.4% |
33.3% |
64.7% |
39 |
1-18-12 |
at GEORGIA |
+1.5 |
127 |
53-57 |
L |
L |
Un |
40.0% |
13.3% |
50.0% |
40 |
34.9% |
10.5% |
73.3% |
39 |
1-14-12 |
vs KENTUCKY |
+10 |
134.5 |
62-65 |
L |
W |
Un |
40.4% |
35.3% |
70.0% |
32 |
42.9% |
40.0% |
72.4% |
35 |
1-12-12 |
at MISSISSIPPI ST |
+7 |
137.5 |
58-62 |
L |
W |
Un |
42.6% |
50.0% |
71.4% |
35 |
44.0% |
31.3% |
76.5% |
28 |
1-7-12 |
vs FLORIDA |
+7.5 |
145.5 |
67-56 |
W |
W |
Un |
51.0% |
50.0% |
57.1% |
34 |
35.7% |
31.8% |
60.0% |
37 |
1-4-12 |
at MEMPHIS |
+8 |
147 |
51-69 |
L |
L |
Un |
36.2% |
23.8% |
57.1% |
26 |
47.2% |
31.3% |
93.3% |
36 |
1-2-12 |
vs UT-CHATTANOOGA |
-13 |
139 |
76-63 |
W |
P |
P |
39.7% |
33.3% |
64.3% |
45 |
34.5% |
42.3% |
63.6% |
37 |
December 2011 |
12-29-11 |
vs THE CITADEL |
-21.5 |
137.5 |
86-55 |
W |
W |
Ov |
55.9% |
40.9% |
73.3% |
40 |
39.3% |
21.1% |
46.7% |
27 |
12-23-11 |
vs E TENN ST |
NL |
NL |
66-63 |
W |
- |
- |
52.2% |
42.1% |
76.9% |
27 |
40.7% |
30.8% |
84.6% |
34 |
12-20-11 |
vs UNC-ASHEVILLE |
NL |
NL |
72-68 |
W |
- |
- |
43.3% |
33.3% |
60.0% |
37 |
44.9% |
36.8% |
70.8% |
33 |
12-14-11 |
at COLL OF CHARLESTON |
+2.5 |
142 |
65-71 |
L |
L |
Un |
45.6% |
31.0% |
66.7% |
36 |
49.0% |
46.7% |
53.8% |
30 |
12-10-11 |
vs AUSTIN PEAY |
-12.5 |
144 |
70-74 |
L |
L |
P |
46.7% |
26.3% |
56.3% |
34 |
59.1% |
62.5% |
77.3% |
24 |
12-3-11 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
+1 |
142.5 |
56-61 |
L |
L |
Un |
45.1% |
28.6% |
75.0% |
32 |
42.2% |
33.3% |
33.3% |
38 |
November 2011 |
11-28-11 |
at OAKLAND |
-2 |
159 |
81-89 |
L |
L |
Ov |
41.3% |
40.9% |
71.4% |
37 |
43.5% |
33.3% |
90.3% |
41 |
11-23-11 |
at CHAMINADE |
-19 |
149 |
86-60 |
W |
W |
Un |
57.1% |
55.6% |
70.0% |
36 |
34.9% |
26.3% |
64.7% |
31 |
11-22-11 |
vs MEMPHIS |
+4 |
147 |
97-99 |
L |
W |
Ov |
40.5% |
33.3% |
81.1% |
49 |
51.4% |
66.7% |
77.8% |
34 |
11-21-11 |
vs DUKE |
+11.5 |
144.5 |
67-77 |
L |
W |
Un |
41.4% |
0.0% |
79.2% |
34 |
48.1% |
38.9% |
66.7% |
37 |
11-16-11 |
vs LA-MONROE |
-21 |
126.5 |
85-62 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.8% |
37.9% |
70.0% |
46 |
42.9% |
42.1% |
75.0% |
27 |
11-11-11 |
vs UNC-GREENSBORO |
-14 |
NL |
92-63 |
W |
W |
- |
64.6% |
62.5% |
68.2% |
31 |
41.5% |
30.0% |
40.0% |
34 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2011-2012 Season Season |
34 |
19-15 (55.9%) |
20-11-1 (64.5%) |
12-17-2 |
41.4% |
58.6% |
68.8 |
65.2 |
+3.6 |
19 |
15-4 (78.9%) |
13-3-1 (81.3%) |
6-8-2 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
70.8 |
60.8 |
+9.9 |
12 |
4-8 (33.3%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
4-8-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
63.1 |
67.3 |
-4.2 |
3 |
0-3 (0.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
78.7 |
84.3 |
-5.7 |
4 |
1-3 (25.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
80.5 |
78.3 |
+2.3 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
64.5 |
61.0 |
+3.5 |
17 |
10-7 (58.8%) |
12-5-0 (70.6%) |
7-10-0 |
41.2% |
58.8% |
64.6 |
62.5 |
+2.1 |
17 |
9-8 (52.9%) |
8-6-1 (57.1%) |
5-7-2 |
41.7% |
58.3% |
72.9 |
67.8 |
+5.1 |
16 |
12-4 (75.0%) |
11-4-1 (73.3%) |
9-4-2 |
69.2% |
30.8% |
75.4 |
63.4 |
+11.9 |
16 |
5-11 (31.3%) |
9-7-0 (56.3%) |
3-13-0 |
18.8% |
81.3% |
62.1 |
66.9 |
-4.8 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
9-2-1 (81.8%) |
6-3-2 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
74.5 |
60.4 |
+14.1 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
0-5-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
62.6 |
60.0 |
+2.6 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
80.0 |
71.0 |
+9.0 |
9 |
2-7 (22.2%) |
3-6-0 (33.3%) |
2-7-0 |
22.2% |
77.8% |
57.4 |
66.0 |
-8.6 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
91.5 |
79.5 |
+12.0 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
56.5 |
67.0 |
-10.5 |
9 |
6-3 (66.7%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
2-6-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
61.1 |
63.0 |
-1.9 |
21 |
12-9 (57.1%) |
12-7-1 (63.2%) |
9-8-2 |
52.9% |
47.1% |
71.0 |
64.6 |
+6.5 |
19 |
10-9 (52.6%) |
10-7-1 (58.8%) |
9-8-1 |
52.9% |
47.1% |
67.5 |
66.5 |
+1.1 |
14 |
8-6 (57.1%) |
9-4-0 (69.2%) |
3-9-1 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
68.8 |
63.6 |
+5.2 |
20 |
9-11 (45.0%) |
12-7-1 (63.2%) |
9-10-1 |
47.4% |
52.6% |
68.9 |
67.9 |
+1.1 |
10 |
7-3 (70.0%) |
6-3-0 (66.7%) |
2-6-1 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
66.5 |
60.9 |
+5.6 |
|
|
|
| |
|