The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SETON HALL - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-6-02 |
vs ST JOHNS |
+4.5 |
135.5 |
58-64 |
L |
L |
Un |
42.9% |
41.2% |
69.2% |
41 |
33.3% |
30.8% |
78.3% |
32 |
3-2-02 |
at CONNECTICUT |
+11 |
139 |
78-90 |
L |
L |
Ov |
46.0% |
48.3% |
100.0% |
23 |
56.1% |
20.0% |
80.6% |
40 |
February 2002 |
2-26-02 |
vs PITTSBURGH |
+3 |
NL |
66-73 |
L |
L |
- |
37.7% |
33.3% |
52.4% |
50 |
37.7% |
25.8% |
72.2% |
40 |
2-23-02 |
at RUTGERS |
+2.5 |
NL |
60-66 |
L |
L |
- |
31.7% |
23.5% |
69.2% |
43 |
33.9% |
31.6% |
60.6% |
48 |
2-21-02 |
vs SYRACUSE |
-1.5 |
138.5 |
71-73 |
L |
L |
Ov |
38.1% |
37.5% |
66.7% |
48 |
44.4% |
31.3% |
70.6% |
34 |
2-16-02 |
vs ILLINOIS |
+4.5 |
142 |
65-75 |
L |
L |
Un |
47.1% |
31.3% |
63.2% |
28 |
42.9% |
45.0% |
78.3% |
35 |
2-12-02 |
vs GEORGETOWN |
-1 |
144.5 |
77-84 |
L |
L |
Ov |
41.7% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
41 |
42.9% |
47.1% |
90.3% |
35 |
2-9-02 |
at W VIRGINIA |
-2 |
NL |
85-79 |
W |
W |
- |
49.2% |
47.6% |
77.3% |
36 |
48.5% |
37.5% |
36.4% |
36 |
2-7-02 |
at PITTSBURGH |
+9.5 |
131.5 |
65-70 |
L |
W |
Ov |
31.9% |
23.1% |
68.2% |
41 |
35.6% |
53.3% |
62.5% |
53 |
2-3-02 |
vs NOTRE DAME |
PK |
135 |
61-63 |
L |
L |
Un |
36.8% |
44.4% |
55.0% |
38 |
38.3% |
40.0% |
73.3% |
42 |
January 2002 |
1-29-02 |
vs ST JOHNS |
-1.5 |
137 |
63-61 |
W |
W |
Un |
38.7% |
29.2% |
80.0% |
33 |
42.9% |
25.0% |
57.1% |
41 |
1-26-02 |
at NOTRE DAME |
+9 |
NL |
51-60 |
L |
P |
- |
29.0% |
16.7% |
58.3% |
46 |
41.2% |
21.4% |
53.6% |
44 |
1-18-02 |
vs W VIRGINIA |
-9.5 |
NL |
81-67 |
W |
W |
- |
37.5% |
28.1% |
68.2% |
41 |
35.3% |
11.1% |
77.3% |
49 |
1-16-02 |
at GEORGETOWN |
+8.5 |
NL |
58-84 |
L |
L |
- |
36.8% |
5.9% |
83.3% |
25 |
51.9% |
54.5% |
75.0% |
38 |
1-11-02 |
vs RUTGERS |
-6 |
NL |
67-54 |
W |
W |
- |
38.9% |
42.1% |
77.3% |
36 |
39.6% |
23.5% |
47.1% |
38 |
1-8-02 |
at SYRACUSE |
+10 |
NL |
70-85 |
L |
L |
- |
41.2% |
31.6% |
71.0% |
25 |
61.1% |
42.1% |
52.4% |
32 |
1-5-02 |
at VIRGINIA TECH |
-1.5 |
NL |
80-72 |
W |
W |
- |
50.8% |
40.7% |
60.0% |
30 |
44.2% |
28.6% |
81.5% |
33 |
December 2001 |
12-31-01 |
vs BOSTON COLLEGE |
-1 |
NL |
66-81 |
L |
L |
- |
34.8% |
36.0% |
75.0% |
38 |
50.0% |
42.1% |
73.1% |
37 |
12-28-01 |
vs FORDHAM |
-5.5 |
NL |
66-57 |
W |
W |
- |
32.3% |
18.8% |
69.2% |
45 |
39.4% |
15.4% |
30.0% |
58 |
12-27-01 |
vs IONA |
-9 |
NL |
70-73 |
L |
L |
- |
28.2% |
24.0% |
61.5% |
62 |
38.7% |
17.6% |
62.9% |
48 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
30 |
12-18 (40.0%) |
11-16-1 (40.7%) |
4-5-0 |
44.4% |
55.6% |
70.5 |
70.8 |
-0.3 |
13 |
6-7 (46.2%) |
3-8-0 (27.3%) |
2-3-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
71.5 |
68.4 |
+3.2 |
12 |
5-7 (41.7%) |
6-5-1 (54.5%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
70.8 |
73.4 |
-2.6 |
5 |
1-4 (20.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.0 |
70.8 |
-3.8 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
68.2 |
69.3 |
-1.2 |
29 |
11-18 (37.9%) |
11-16-1 (40.7%) |
4-5-0 |
44.4% |
55.6% |
69.7 |
70.7 |
-1.1 |
14 |
9-5 (64.3%) |
7-7-0 (50.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
73.1 |
68.8 |
+4.4 |
13 |
1-12 (7.7%) |
4-8-1 (33.3%) |
2-3-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
66.4 |
74.9 |
-8.5 |
8 |
4-4 (50.0%) |
3-5-0 (37.5%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
71.4 |
69.3 |
+2.1 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
65.5 |
74.0 |
-8.5 |
4 |
4-0 (100.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
79.3 |
69.8 |
+9.5 |
8 |
1-7 (12.5%) |
3-4-1 (42.9%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
66.6 |
75.3 |
-8.6 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.3 |
66.3 |
+1.0 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.3 |
71.3 |
+9.0 |
8 |
2-6 (25.0%) |
3-5-0 (37.5%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
69.5 |
73.6 |
-4.1 |
15 |
5-10 (33.3%) |
5-8-1 (38.5%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
69.1 |
70.1 |
-1.0 |
12 |
3-9 (25.0%) |
2-8-1 (20.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
70.3 |
74.2 |
-3.9 |
17 |
8-9 (47.1%) |
8-8-0 (50.0%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
69.7 |
67.9 |
+1.8 |
11 |
3-8 (27.3%) |
2-8-1 (20.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
69.9 |
74.0 |
-4.1 |
15 |
6-9 (40.0%) |
6-7-0 (46.2%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
70.0 |
68.9 |
+1.1 |
|
|
|
| |
|