The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SACRAMENTO ST - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-2-02 |
vs PORTLAND ST |
-1 |
NL |
67-74 |
L |
L |
- |
40.3% |
36.0% |
88.9% |
30 |
48.2% |
34.8% |
66.7% |
40 |
3-1-02 |
vs E WASHINGTON |
+4.5 |
NL |
71-81 |
L |
L |
- |
38.3% |
30.8% |
77.3% |
33 |
51.1% |
9.1% |
74.4% |
36 |
February 2002 |
2-23-02 |
at MONTANA ST |
+15 |
NL |
60-70 |
L |
W |
- |
42.9% |
33.3% |
73.7% |
33 |
45.3% |
34.8% |
58.3% |
32 |
2-22-02 |
at MONTANA |
+10.5 |
NL |
53-86 |
L |
L |
- |
30.6% |
25.0% |
41.7% |
43 |
50.7% |
32.0% |
66.7% |
46 |
2-16-02 |
at N ARIZONA |
+13 |
NL |
70-90 |
L |
L |
- |
40.6% |
10.0% |
66.7% |
33 |
50.0% |
26.7% |
75.6% |
46 |
2-9-02 |
vs IDAHO ST |
-4.5 |
NL |
90-80 |
W |
W |
- |
57.1% |
33.3% |
60.6% |
32 |
45.8% |
30.4% |
73.1% |
35 |
2-8-02 |
vs WEBER ST |
-6 |
NL |
72-76 |
L |
L |
- |
38.2% |
24.0% |
77.8% |
44 |
33.3% |
43.5% |
72.2% |
44 |
2-2-02 |
at E WASHINGTON |
+10 |
NL |
67-87 |
L |
L |
- |
39.3% |
45.5% |
73.7% |
31 |
55.4% |
57.1% |
73.9% |
37 |
2-1-02 |
at PORTLAND ST |
+7.5 |
NL |
83-86 |
L |
W |
- |
48.3% |
50.0% |
75.0% |
27 |
55.9% |
43.8% |
76.5% |
34 |
January 2002 |
1-26-02 |
vs MONTANA |
-1 |
NL |
78-88 |
L |
L |
- |
33.3% |
32.1% |
67.7% |
45 |
50.0% |
38.9% |
64.3% |
41 |
1-25-02 |
vs MONTANA ST |
+5.5 |
NL |
78-56 |
W |
W |
- |
51.6% |
37.5% |
60.0% |
36 |
33.9% |
25.0% |
59.1% |
38 |
1-19-02 |
vs N ARIZONA |
+3 |
NL |
81-63 |
W |
W |
- |
47.1% |
28.6% |
72.5% |
39 |
38.1% |
16.7% |
54.5% |
38 |
1-12-02 |
at WEBER ST |
+19 |
NL |
83-86 |
L |
W |
- |
55.1% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
25 |
56.6% |
35.7% |
65.6% |
34 |
1-11-02 |
at IDAHO ST |
+10 |
NL |
79-87 |
L |
W |
- |
41.8% |
37.9% |
54.5% |
36 |
45.3% |
52.4% |
77.8% |
40 |
1-7-02 |
vs DOMINICAN-CA |
NL |
NL |
91-73 |
W |
- |
- |
51.7% |
62.5% |
75.0% |
42 |
42.4% |
33.3% |
59.1% |
29 |
1-3-02 |
vs TEXAS A&M CC |
NL |
NL |
82-69 |
W |
- |
- |
47.5% |
40.0% |
62.5% |
42 |
40.3% |
26.3% |
62.5% |
39 |
December 2001 |
12-30-01 |
vs IDAHO |
-2.5 |
NL |
63-75 |
L |
L |
- |
34.9% |
33.3% |
78.6% |
34 |
49.0% |
38.9% |
66.7% |
40 |
12-27-01 |
at UC-RIVERSIDE |
+9.5 |
NL |
66-100 |
L |
L |
- |
38.9% |
27.3% |
29.2% |
32 |
61.9% |
58.8% |
60.0% |
50 |
12-17-01 |
vs LIPSCOMB |
NL |
NL |
86-76 |
W |
- |
- |
42.9% |
38.9% |
63.3% |
38 |
53.7% |
41.7% |
72.7% |
35 |
12-15-01 |
at CS-FULLERTON |
+8 |
NL |
97-106 |
L |
L |
- |
45.3% |
38.1% |
63.6% |
37 |
52.3% |
40.9% |
65.9% |
46 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
28 |
9-19 (32.1%) |
9-13-0 (40.9%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.4 |
77.6 |
-4.3 |
15 |
9-6 (60.0%) |
4-5-0 (44.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.2 |
71.5 |
+4.7 |
12 |
0-12 (0.0%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.6 |
86.1 |
-14.5 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
52.0 |
69.0 |
-17.0 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
49.0 |
62.5 |
-13.5 |
28 |
9-19 (32.1%) |
9-13-0 (40.9%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.4 |
77.6 |
-4.3 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.8 |
78.7 |
-2.8 |
16 |
2-14 (12.5%) |
7-9-0 (43.8%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.3 |
81.4 |
-10.1 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.8 |
78.7 |
-2.8 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.7 |
66.7 |
+10.0 |
12 |
0-12 (0.0%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.6 |
86.1 |
-14.5 |
7 |
1-6 (14.3%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.1 |
77.3 |
-7.1 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.5 |
85.5 |
-4.0 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.3 |
73.0 |
+3.3 |
16 |
5-11 (31.3%) |
5-8-0 (38.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.2 |
77.7 |
-4.5 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.3 |
80.7 |
-2.3 |
3 |
0-3 (0.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.0 |
81.0 |
-11.0 |
9 |
3-6 (33.3%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.0 |
81.1 |
-5.1 |
18 |
6-12 (33.3%) |
5-8-0 (38.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.2 |
76.4 |
-3.2 |
9 |
2-7 (22.2%) |
3-6-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.3 |
80.4 |
-6.1 |
12 |
4-8 (33.3%) |
3-5-0 (37.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.6 |
76.3 |
-3.7 |
|
|
|
| |
|