The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PITTSBURGH - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-21-02 |
vs KENT ST |
-2 |
129 |
73-78 |
L |
L |
Ov |
46.0% |
27.3% |
60.0% |
39 |
44.8% |
29.4% |
84.0% |
26 |
3-17-02 |
vs CALIFORNIA |
-3 |
131.5 |
63-50 |
W |
W |
Un |
43.4% |
29.4% |
46.2% |
43 |
31.0% |
16.7% |
62.5% |
39 |
3-15-02 |
vs C CONN ST |
-14.5 |
128 |
71-54 |
W |
W |
Un |
52.6% |
31.3% |
54.5% |
26 |
44.2% |
46.2% |
76.9% |
29 |
3-9-02 |
vs CONNECTICUT |
-1.5 |
137.5 |
65-74 |
L |
L |
Ov |
41.7% |
27.8% |
66.7% |
33 |
43.3% |
50.0% |
73.3% |
43 |
3-8-02 |
vs MIAMI |
-4 |
134.5 |
76-71 |
W |
W |
Ov |
52.7% |
35.3% |
75.0% |
33 |
41.5% |
35.0% |
83.3% |
33 |
3-7-02 |
vs BOSTON COLLEGE |
-4.5 |
135 |
76-62 |
W |
W |
Ov |
46.4% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
40 |
40.8% |
30.8% |
85.7% |
23 |
3-2-02 |
vs W VIRGINIA |
-16.5 |
NL |
92-65 |
W |
W |
- |
56.5% |
33.3% |
61.9% |
36 |
45.1% |
33.3% |
81.3% |
28 |
February 2002 |
2-26-02 |
at SETON HALL |
-3 |
NL |
73-66 |
W |
W |
- |
37.7% |
25.8% |
72.2% |
40 |
37.7% |
33.3% |
52.4% |
50 |
2-21-02 |
vs RUTGERS |
-10.5 |
NL |
78-59 |
W |
W |
- |
54.5% |
17.6% |
57.7% |
46 |
36.5% |
13.3% |
55.0% |
29 |
2-16-02 |
at W VIRGINIA |
-8.5 |
138 |
85-75 |
W |
W |
Ov |
53.3% |
35.0% |
51.9% |
35 |
46.0% |
38.9% |
62.5% |
38 |
2-10-02 |
at SYRACUSE |
+4.5 |
133.5 |
75-63 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
35.3% |
72.2% |
37 |
42.1% |
15.4% |
68.4% |
27 |
2-7-02 |
vs SETON HALL |
-9.5 |
131.5 |
70-65 |
W |
L |
Ov |
35.6% |
53.3% |
62.5% |
53 |
31.9% |
23.1% |
68.2% |
41 |
2-2-02 |
vs VILLANOVA |
-8 |
NL |
71-59 |
W |
W |
- |
48.3% |
35.0% |
85.7% |
25 |
41.5% |
38.5% |
95.2% |
30 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
at NOTRE DAME |
+3 |
NL |
76-89 |
L |
L |
- |
43.8% |
31.8% |
52.0% |
29 |
66.7% |
46.2% |
71.4% |
34 |
1-26-02 |
vs GEORGETOWN |
-3 |
NL |
67-56 |
W |
W |
- |
45.1% |
37.5% |
60.0% |
33 |
36.5% |
29.2% |
84.6% |
37 |
1-22-02 |
vs SYRACUSE |
-3 |
NL |
72-57 |
W |
W |
- |
46.8% |
37.5% |
61.3% |
43 |
42.6% |
31.3% |
85.7% |
18 |
1-19-02 |
at GEORGETOWN |
+6 |
NL |
68-67 |
W |
W |
- |
45.3% |
35.0% |
76.5% |
35 |
36.7% |
34.8% |
88.5% |
27 |
1-15-02 |
at MIAMI |
+5 |
NL |
69-76 |
L |
L |
- |
46.0% |
36.4% |
83.3% |
38 |
45.3% |
26.3% |
76.5% |
27 |
1-12-02 |
vs NOTRE DAME |
-4.5 |
NL |
53-56 |
L |
L |
- |
34.5% |
23.8% |
61.5% |
38 |
38.9% |
40.0% |
76.9% |
36 |
1-8-02 |
at RUTGERS |
-2.5 |
NL |
66-58 |
W |
W |
- |
44.0% |
28.6% |
54.5% |
40 |
35.6% |
30.0% |
43.5% |
41 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
35 |
29-6 (82.9%) |
21-8-1 (72.4%) |
7-2-0 |
77.8% |
22.2% |
72.3 |
60.9 |
+11.3 |
17 |
16-1 (94.1%) |
8-3-1 (72.7%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
73.9 |
56.1 |
+17.9 |
9 |
7-2 (77.8%) |
7-2-0 (77.8%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
72.3 |
69.2 |
+3.1 |
9 |
6-3 (66.7%) |
6-3-0 (66.7%) |
4-2-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
69.1 |
61.9 |
+7.2 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
3-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
69.2 |
62.5 |
+6.7 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
69.0 |
60.7 |
+8.3 |
35 |
29-6 (82.9%) |
21-8-1 (72.4%) |
7-2-0 |
77.8% |
22.2% |
72.3 |
60.9 |
+11.3 |
23 |
20-3 (87.0%) |
17-5-1 (77.3%) |
6-2-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
71.3 |
59.7 |
+11.7 |
7 |
4-3 (57.1%) |
4-3-0 (57.1%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
70.0 |
70.4 |
-0.4 |
12 |
11-1 (91.7%) |
8-3-1 (72.7%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.4 |
57.1 |
+14.3 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
3-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
74.7 |
66.3 |
+8.3 |
6 |
4-2 (66.7%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
71.2 |
70.7 |
+0.5 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
67.3 |
65.0 |
+2.3 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-1 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
69.0 |
53.0 |
+16.0 |
9 |
8-1 (88.9%) |
8-1-0 (88.9%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
73.4 |
61.8 |
+11.7 |
19 |
16-3 (84.2%) |
10-5-0 (66.7%) |
4-1-0 |
80.0% |
20.0% |
73.3 |
60.9 |
+12.4 |
29 |
24-5 (82.8%) |
18-7-1 (72.0%) |
7-1-0 |
87.5% |
12.5% |
72.0 |
61.6 |
+10.4 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
73.2 |
58.2 |
+15.0 |
21 |
16-5 (76.2%) |
13-7-0 (65.0%) |
6-1-0 |
85.7% |
14.3% |
71.4 |
64.0 |
+7.4 |
7 |
6-1 (85.7%) |
5-1-0 (83.3%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
71.9 |
58.4 |
+13.4 |
|
|
|
| |
|