The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OAKLAND - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-3-02 |
vs IUPUI |
NL |
NL |
84-90 |
L |
- |
- |
41.9% |
31.3% |
60.0% |
32 |
57.4% |
30.8% |
82.1% |
39 |
February 2002 |
2-23-02 |
at W ILLINOIS |
NL |
NL |
86-82 |
W |
- |
- |
47.1% |
43.5% |
71.8% |
31 |
48.2% |
45.2% |
70.0% |
35 |
2-21-02 |
at VALPARAISO |
NL |
NL |
72-79 |
L |
- |
- |
40.3% |
31.8% |
84.6% |
38 |
55.4% |
33.3% |
58.8% |
33 |
2-16-02 |
at IUPUI |
NL |
NL |
94-92 |
W |
- |
- |
54.5% |
42.9% |
73.5% |
41 |
43.9% |
22.7% |
75.0% |
40 |
2-9-02 |
vs MISSOURI-KC |
NL |
NL |
72-59 |
W |
- |
- |
46.7% |
39.1% |
67.7% |
32 |
34.0% |
33.3% |
90.5% |
31 |
2-7-02 |
vs ORAL ROBERTS |
NL |
NL |
85-76 |
W |
- |
- |
46.7% |
23.1% |
81.3% |
39 |
43.9% |
28.6% |
62.5% |
38 |
2-2-02 |
at CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
78-73 |
W |
- |
- |
50.0% |
35.3% |
62.9% |
31 |
47.6% |
25.0% |
64.3% |
36 |
January 2002 |
1-31-02 |
at SOUTHERN UTAH |
NL |
NL |
84-60 |
W |
- |
- |
43.1% |
40.6% |
68.2% |
44 |
46.9% |
28.6% |
66.7% |
28 |
1-26-02 |
vs VALPARAISO |
NL |
NL |
77-86 |
L |
- |
- |
42.4% |
39.1% |
60.0% |
33 |
55.1% |
42.1% |
75.0% |
35 |
1-24-02 |
vs W ILLINOIS |
NL |
NL |
93-75 |
W |
- |
- |
47.0% |
41.7% |
77.8% |
41 |
45.2% |
33.3% |
63.2% |
33 |
1-19-02 |
vs IUPUI |
NL |
NL |
83-69 |
W |
- |
- |
50.0% |
38.1% |
44.0% |
37 |
43.4% |
30.0% |
68.0% |
37 |
1-12-02 |
at ORAL ROBERTS |
NL |
NL |
61-93 |
L |
- |
- |
35.5% |
23.5% |
61.9% |
27 |
57.1% |
43.5% |
82.6% |
43 |
1-10-02 |
at MISSOURI-KC |
NL |
NL |
63-72 |
L |
- |
- |
32.3% |
30.6% |
80.0% |
44 |
46.9% |
31.8% |
86.4% |
51 |
1-5-02 |
vs SOUTHERN UTAH |
NL |
NL |
58-57 |
W |
- |
- |
40.0% |
34.8% |
66.7% |
33 |
49.0% |
36.8% |
50.0% |
27 |
1-3-02 |
vs CHICAGO ST |
NL |
NL |
88-77 |
W |
- |
- |
44.3% |
40.0% |
57.8% |
36 |
44.4% |
50.0% |
63.2% |
48 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
vs W MICHIGAN |
NL |
NL |
100-94 |
W |
- |
- |
54.0% |
43.5% |
64.7% |
40 |
45.5% |
38.7% |
80.0% |
37 |
12-27-01 |
vs TOLEDO |
NL |
NL |
93-68 |
W |
- |
- |
55.0% |
50.0% |
69.2% |
32 |
43.1% |
26.1% |
70.6% |
35 |
12-19-01 |
at MICHIGAN ST |
NL |
NL |
50-78 |
L |
- |
- |
30.2% |
22.2% |
66.7% |
24 |
53.7% |
44.4% |
69.6% |
51 |
12-15-01 |
at OHIO U |
NL |
NL |
70-71 |
L |
- |
- |
40.7% |
32.0% |
58.3% |
37 |
41.7% |
18.8% |
58.1% |
43 |
12-11-01 |
at WRIGHT ST |
NL |
NL |
54-74 |
L |
- |
- |
34.3% |
13.3% |
44.4% |
36 |
49.0% |
47.4% |
68.0% |
42 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
29 |
17-12 (58.6%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.7 |
73.9 |
+1.8 |
11 |
10-1 (90.9%) |
0-0-0 ( ) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
85.1 |
72.8 |
+12.3 |
13 |
5-8 (38.5%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.2 |
76.7 |
-6.5 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.2 |
69.0 |
+0.2 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.5 |
72.3 |
-2.8 |
28 |
16-12 (57.1%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.0 |
73.9 |
+1.1 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.0 |
58.5 |
+15.5 |
3 |
0-3 (0.0%) |
0-3-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
61.7 |
75.7 |
-14.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.0 |
89.0 |
-18.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.0 |
60.5 |
+8.5 |
9 |
6-3 (66.7%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.3 |
76.2 |
-2.9 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
53.5 |
72.0 |
-18.5 |
16 |
10-6 (62.5%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.6 |
74.5 |
+6.1 |
17 |
10-7 (58.8%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.7 |
75.3 |
-0.6 |
11 |
7-4 (63.6%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
77.5 |
71.1 |
+6.4 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.0 |
76.5 |
-5.5 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
77.0 |
62.7 |
+14.3 |
|
|
|
| |
|