The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC STATE - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-17-02 |
vs CONNECTICUT |
+1.5 |
144.5 |
74-77 |
L |
L |
Ov |
40.6% |
42.3% |
73.3% |
27 |
61.9% |
50.0% |
95.5% |
30 |
3-15-02 |
vs MICHIGAN ST |
+1 |
132.5 |
69-58 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.9% |
22.2% |
86.1% |
28 |
32.1% |
30.4% |
94.4% |
33 |
3-10-02 |
vs DUKE |
+14 |
154 |
61-91 |
L |
L |
Un |
36.7% |
37.5% |
78.6% |
32 |
63.5% |
42.1% |
85.0% |
29 |
3-9-02 |
vs MARYLAND |
+9.5 |
152 |
86-82 |
W |
W |
Ov |
59.2% |
40.7% |
60.7% |
28 |
47.5% |
28.6% |
87.0% |
31 |
3-8-02 |
vs VIRGINIA |
PK |
146 |
92-72 |
W |
W |
Ov |
60.4% |
72.2% |
80.8% |
32 |
48.1% |
46.7% |
60.0% |
23 |
3-2-02 |
at WAKE FOREST |
+6 |
153 |
71-83 |
L |
L |
Ov |
41.9% |
32.1% |
66.7% |
28 |
45.0% |
16.7% |
73.0% |
48 |
February 2002 |
2-24-02 |
vs N CAROLINA |
-12.5 |
145 |
98-76 |
W |
W |
Ov |
48.3% |
43.5% |
81.1% |
37 |
46.6% |
46.7% |
71.4% |
31 |
2-20-02 |
at GEORGIA TECH |
-1.5 |
NL |
59-65 |
L |
L |
- |
36.4% |
40.9% |
90.9% |
33 |
40.7% |
27.8% |
80.0% |
38 |
2-16-02 |
vs CLEMSON |
-12 |
NL |
83-54 |
W |
W |
- |
43.9% |
45.2% |
90.5% |
40 |
38.5% |
8.3% |
59.1% |
30 |
2-14-02 |
at DUKE |
+17.5 |
155 |
71-108 |
L |
L |
Ov |
50.0% |
21.4% |
53.8% |
26 |
62.7% |
29.4% |
79.2% |
34 |
2-10-02 |
at FLORIDA ST |
-2.5 |
NL |
76-67 |
W |
W |
- |
42.9% |
30.8% |
83.9% |
33 |
41.1% |
30.0% |
65.2% |
33 |
2-6-02 |
vs VIRGINIA |
-2.5 |
145.5 |
85-68 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.9% |
45.0% |
81.5% |
31 |
40.4% |
8.3% |
77.8% |
38 |
2-3-02 |
at MARYLAND |
+11.5 |
149 |
73-89 |
L |
L |
Ov |
50.0% |
37.5% |
82.4% |
23 |
50.9% |
50.0% |
72.2% |
34 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
vs WAKE FOREST |
-2.5 |
143 |
81-82 |
L |
L |
Ov |
44.1% |
40.0% |
80.8% |
28 |
53.1% |
37.5% |
85.7% |
32 |
1-26-02 |
vs TEMPLE |
-8 |
130 |
80-61 |
W |
W |
Ov |
46.3% |
33.3% |
80.8% |
33 |
39.3% |
24.0% |
91.7% |
31 |
1-23-02 |
at N CAROLINA |
-5 |
NL |
77-59 |
W |
W |
- |
46.4% |
31.6% |
63.3% |
33 |
41.7% |
31.3% |
82.4% |
28 |
1-19-02 |
vs GEORGIA TECH |
-12 |
NL |
84-71 |
W |
W |
- |
45.6% |
36.0% |
76.7% |
39 |
40.0% |
45.8% |
63.2% |
35 |
1-15-02 |
at CLEMSON |
-2.5 |
NL |
80-79 |
W |
L |
- |
49.1% |
48.4% |
75.0% |
20 |
61.2% |
41.7% |
70.0% |
32 |
1-13-02 |
vs DUKE |
+10.5 |
155 |
57-76 |
L |
L |
Un |
39.3% |
31.6% |
50.0% |
36 |
46.7% |
38.1% |
70.6% |
37 |
1-8-02 |
vs FLORIDA ST |
-8.5 |
NL |
77-62 |
W |
W |
- |
45.6% |
32.0% |
68.0% |
34 |
43.4% |
25.0% |
81.3% |
35 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
34 |
23-11 (67.6%) |
17-14-1 (54.8%) |
11-5-0 |
68.8% |
31.3% |
75.4 |
67.8 |
+7.7 |
18 |
14-4 (77.8%) |
10-5-1 (66.7%) |
4-2-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
77.6 |
61.2 |
+16.3 |
11 |
6-5 (54.5%) |
4-7-0 (36.4%) |
4-1-0 |
80.0% |
20.0% |
71.5 |
74.7 |
-3.2 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
3-2-0 (60.0%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
76.4 |
76.0 |
+0.4 |
6 |
5-1 (83.3%) |
5-1-0 (83.3%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
80.5 |
66.5 |
+14.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
71.5 |
67.5 |
+4.0 |
34 |
23-11 (67.6%) |
17-14-1 (54.8%) |
11-5-0 |
68.8% |
31.3% |
75.4 |
67.8 |
+7.7 |
19 |
16-3 (84.2%) |
12-6-1 (66.7%) |
4-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
77.4 |
62.4 |
+15.0 |
12 |
4-8 (33.3%) |
4-8-0 (33.3%) |
6-5-0 |
54.5% |
45.5% |
70.0 |
78.5 |
-8.5 |
14 |
12-2 (85.7%) |
10-3-1 (76.9%) |
4-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
79.4 |
60.7 |
+18.7 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
61.0 |
74.0 |
-13.0 |
5 |
4-1 (80.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.8 |
67.2 |
+4.6 |
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
2-4-0 (33.3%) |
4-1-0 |
80.0% |
20.0% |
71.3 |
81.0 |
-9.7 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
3-1-0 (75.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
74.0 |
69.0 |
+5.0 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
79.0 |
70.0 |
+9.0 |
5 |
5-0 (100.0%) |
4-1-0 (80.0%) |
3-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
77.4 |
62.4 |
+15.0 |
22 |
13-9 (59.1%) |
9-10-1 (47.4%) |
6-4-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
74.8 |
68.5 |
+6.3 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.5 |
51.5 |
+23.0 |
23 |
14-9 (60.9%) |
9-11-1 (45.0%) |
7-4-0 |
63.6% |
36.4% |
72.5 |
68.3 |
+4.1 |
10 |
8-2 (80.0%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
4-1-0 |
80.0% |
20.0% |
80.3 |
68.1 |
+12.2 |
17 |
10-7 (58.8%) |
8-7-1 (53.3%) |
7-2-0 |
77.8% |
22.2% |
74.6 |
70.4 |
+4.2 |
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
77.1 |
68.3 |
+8.8 |
|
|
|
| |
|