The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MOREHEAD ST - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-1-02 |
vs MURRAY ST |
+4 |
NL |
75-89 |
L |
L |
- |
50.0% |
38.9% |
72.7% |
27 |
50.8% |
41.2% |
76.9% |
38 |
February 2002 |
2-26-02 |
vs TENNESSEE ST |
-7.5 |
NL |
91-82 |
W |
W |
- |
62.5% |
38.5% |
59.3% |
36 |
45.9% |
30.8% |
85.7% |
24 |
2-23-02 |
at MURRAY ST |
+7.5 |
NL |
66-60 |
W |
W |
- |
55.3% |
47.1% |
66.7% |
25 |
40.3% |
17.4% |
85.7% |
34 |
2-21-02 |
at TENN-MARTIN |
+2.5 |
NL |
84-72 |
W |
W |
- |
56.3% |
45.5% |
80.6% |
30 |
45.2% |
30.0% |
66.7% |
32 |
2-18-02 |
vs AUSTIN PEAY |
-5 |
NL |
66-51 |
W |
W |
- |
43.9% |
35.3% |
62.5% |
30 |
44.0% |
0.0% |
50.0% |
37 |
2-16-02 |
at E KENTUCKY |
-3.5 |
NL |
76-60 |
W |
W |
- |
48.1% |
23.1% |
88.5% |
36 |
43.3% |
11.1% |
75.0% |
27 |
2-12-02 |
at TENNESSEE TECH |
+13 |
NL |
68-75 |
L |
W |
- |
50.0% |
50.0% |
80.0% |
24 |
46.9% |
30.4% |
91.7% |
29 |
2-9-02 |
vs E ILLINOIS |
-6 |
NL |
68-76 |
L |
L |
- |
34.5% |
21.7% |
92.0% |
37 |
44.6% |
26.3% |
91.3% |
35 |
2-7-02 |
vs SE MISSOURI ST |
-10 |
NL |
91-75 |
W |
W |
- |
48.1% |
57.1% |
81.8% |
35 |
50.0% |
35.3% |
85.0% |
26 |
2-4-02 |
at AUSTIN PEAY |
+5.5 |
NL |
68-65 |
W |
W |
- |
47.1% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
34 |
45.8% |
28.6% |
71.4% |
33 |
January 2002 |
1-28-02 |
at TENNESSEE ST |
-1.5 |
NL |
72-91 |
L |
L |
- |
44.2% |
33.3% |
84.6% |
26 |
53.8% |
68.8% |
82.8% |
31 |
1-26-02 |
vs TENN-MARTIN |
-3.5 |
NL |
89-88 |
W |
L |
- |
64.2% |
41.7% |
66.7% |
24 |
61.0% |
64.3% |
58.3% |
26 |
1-24-02 |
vs MURRAY ST |
-1.5 |
NL |
92-83 |
W |
W |
- |
48.3% |
63.2% |
82.8% |
29 |
46.1% |
30.8% |
83.3% |
44 |
1-19-02 |
vs E KENTUCKY |
-13.5 |
NL |
84-71 |
W |
L |
- |
52.5% |
33.3% |
80.0% |
32 |
42.9% |
36.4% |
83.3% |
34 |
1-15-02 |
vs OHIO DOMINICAN |
NL |
NL |
86-73 |
W |
- |
- |
57.9% |
53.8% |
76.5% |
27 |
49.2% |
71.4% |
71.4% |
31 |
1-12-02 |
at SE MISSOURI ST |
-1.5 |
NL |
59-53 |
W |
W |
- |
41.1% |
0.0% |
81.3% |
33 |
40.0% |
35.3% |
84.6% |
27 |
1-10-02 |
at E ILLINOIS |
+4 |
NL |
71-72 |
L |
W |
- |
45.6% |
0.0% |
100.0% |
32 |
44.8% |
31.8% |
61.9% |
33 |
1-5-02 |
vs TENNESSEE TECH |
+5 |
NL |
78-81 |
L |
W |
- |
53.7% |
43.5% |
76.9% |
23 |
52.7% |
44.0% |
80.0% |
31 |
1-3-02 |
vs TENNESSEE ST |
-7.5 |
NL |
92-72 |
W |
W |
- |
56.9% |
25.0% |
82.8% |
44 |
37.1% |
28.9% |
60.0% |
30 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
at VANDERBILT |
+12.5 |
NL |
73-83 |
L |
W |
- |
45.8% |
25.9% |
63.2% |
30 |
40.3% |
32.3% |
79.2% |
49 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
29 |
18-11 (62.1%) |
16-7-0 (69.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
77.1 |
75.2 |
+1.9 |
14 |
12-2 (85.7%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
85.4 |
75.6 |
+9.8 |
14 |
6-8 (42.9%) |
9-2-0 (81.8%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.0 |
73.9 |
-4.9 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.0 |
89.0 |
-14.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
83.0 |
85.5 |
-2.5 |
28 |
17-11 (60.7%) |
16-7-0 (69.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.9 |
75.3 |
+1.6 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
7-5-0 (58.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.5 |
74.1 |
+7.4 |
10 |
3-7 (30.0%) |
8-2-0 (80.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.9 |
77.6 |
-7.7 |
9 |
8-1 (88.9%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
85.7 |
76.1 |
+9.6 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.0 |
81.0 |
-3.0 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.0 |
68.0 |
+1.0 |
8 |
3-5 (37.5%) |
7-1-0 (87.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.3 |
75.8 |
-7.5 |
7 |
4-3 (57.1%) |
4-3-0 (57.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.1 |
71.4 |
-0.3 |
10 |
6-4 (60.0%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.6 |
76.0 |
+0.6 |
12 |
8-4 (66.7%) |
8-2-0 (80.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.0 |
76.8 |
+4.2 |
18 |
11-7 (61.1%) |
8-6-0 (57.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.8 |
78.2 |
+0.6 |
10 |
6-4 (60.0%) |
8-1-0 (88.9%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.5 |
70.1 |
+3.4 |
16 |
12-4 (75.0%) |
10-4-0 (71.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
79.2 |
72.5 |
+6.7 |
6 |
3-3 (50.0%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.2 |
78.5 |
-8.3 |
|
|
|
| |
|