The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIRFIELD - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-3-02 |
vs SIENA |
+3 |
NL |
63-83 |
L |
L |
- |
37.5% |
43.5% |
64.7% |
37 |
52.6% |
47.1% |
78.9% |
34 |
3-2-02 |
vs MANHATTAN |
+6 |
NL |
81-74 |
W |
W |
- |
40.8% |
25.0% |
77.1% |
40 |
38.6% |
23.1% |
73.9% |
41 |
February 2002 |
2-23-02 |
at ST PETERS |
-5 |
NL |
93-61 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
38.9% |
76.5% |
38 |
36.8% |
0.0% |
67.9% |
34 |
2-18-02 |
vs CANISIUS |
-7 |
NL |
72-54 |
W |
W |
- |
44.6% |
42.1% |
70.0% |
46 |
29.2% |
8.7% |
58.8% |
42 |
2-16-02 |
at SIENA |
+7 |
NL |
60-57 |
W |
W |
- |
35.2% |
13.3% |
71.4% |
35 |
35.2% |
42.9% |
68.4% |
41 |
2-14-02 |
vs MARIST |
+2.5 |
NL |
64-76 |
L |
L |
- |
36.1% |
27.8% |
83.3% |
37 |
45.6% |
38.9% |
94.4% |
36 |
2-12-02 |
vs CHARLESTON SO |
NL |
NL |
70-55 |
W |
- |
- |
45.0% |
29.4% |
73.3% |
40 |
39.3% |
25.0% |
50.0% |
34 |
2-10-02 |
vs SIENA |
-2 |
NL |
79-72 |
W |
W |
- |
46.8% |
45.0% |
81.3% |
40 |
37.1% |
25.0% |
76.0% |
32 |
2-8-02 |
at RIDER |
+10 |
NL |
59-73 |
L |
L |
- |
43.4% |
55.6% |
57.1% |
36 |
38.5% |
33.3% |
82.4% |
41 |
2-6-02 |
at ST JOHNS |
+15 |
NL |
56-95 |
L |
L |
- |
32.1% |
31.6% |
60.9% |
37 |
55.7% |
38.9% |
76.9% |
38 |
2-2-02 |
vs MANHATTAN |
+5 |
NL |
70-73 |
L |
W |
- |
41.5% |
53.8% |
76.3% |
31 |
39.6% |
27.8% |
81.3% |
31 |
January 2002 |
1-29-02 |
vs NIAGARA |
-4.5 |
NL |
77-80 |
L |
L |
- |
47.3% |
30.0% |
73.3% |
28 |
47.3% |
43.5% |
62.1% |
39 |
1-26-02 |
at MARIST |
+8 |
NL |
84-93 |
L |
L |
- |
49.2% |
16.7% |
77.4% |
41 |
45.2% |
44.4% |
74.4% |
32 |
1-23-02 |
vs LOYOLA-MD |
-15 |
NL |
72-48 |
W |
W |
- |
50.9% |
33.3% |
81.3% |
31 |
32.6% |
20.0% |
73.9% |
27 |
1-20-02 |
at LOYOLA-MD |
-5 |
NL |
64-53 |
W |
W |
- |
45.6% |
0.0% |
60.0% |
38 |
32.7% |
27.8% |
63.6% |
36 |
1-18-02 |
at IONA |
+4.5 |
NL |
79-90 |
L |
L |
- |
42.6% |
23.8% |
76.2% |
29 |
45.5% |
27.3% |
77.1% |
47 |
1-14-02 |
vs RIDER |
-2 |
NL |
69-57 |
W |
W |
- |
44.0% |
47.1% |
77.3% |
41 |
30.4% |
29.2% |
80.0% |
39 |
1-12-02 |
at NIAGARA |
+5.5 |
NL |
77-79 |
L |
W |
- |
47.5% |
43.5% |
69.2% |
27 |
57.1% |
57.1% |
76.7% |
27 |
1-10-02 |
at MANHATTAN |
+13.5 |
NL |
72-88 |
L |
L |
- |
40.0% |
38.9% |
80.6% |
29 |
52.5% |
33.3% |
69.2% |
34 |
1-8-02 |
vs ST PETERS |
-11.5 |
NL |
95-75 |
W |
W |
- |
66.7% |
53.8% |
70.6% |
44 |
40.0% |
46.7% |
85.7% |
32 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
29 |
12-17 (41.4%) |
13-13-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.7 |
73.0 |
-1.3 |
13 |
7-6 (53.8%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.5 |
68.9 |
+5.5 |
14 |
4-10 (28.6%) |
5-8-0 (38.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.0 |
76.0 |
-7.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.0 |
78.5 |
-6.5 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.7 |
75.0 |
-6.3 |
29 |
12-17 (41.4%) |
13-13-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.7 |
73.0 |
-1.3 |
11 |
7-4 (63.6%) |
7-4-0 (63.6%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.4 |
64.5 |
+9.9 |
15 |
3-12 (20.0%) |
6-9-0 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.9 |
80.9 |
-11.1 |
8 |
5-3 (62.5%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.9 |
65.9 |
+9.0 |
3 |
0-3 (0.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.7 |
81.0 |
-6.3 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.0 |
60.7 |
+12.3 |
10 |
2-8 (20.0%) |
3-7-0 (30.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.0 |
81.4 |
-13.4 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
63.0 |
83.0 |
-20.0 |
12 |
6-6 (50.0%) |
7-3-0 (70.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.3 |
68.8 |
+1.4 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.6 |
73.4 |
+7.2 |
11 |
3-8 (27.3%) |
4-7-0 (36.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
69.9 |
76.5 |
-6.5 |
12 |
5-7 (41.7%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.8 |
72.7 |
+0.2 |
16 |
7-9 (43.8%) |
9-6-0 (60.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.4 |
73.6 |
-2.2 |
13 |
7-6 (53.8%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.3 |
72.1 |
+1.2 |
12 |
4-8 (33.3%) |
7-5-0 (58.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.6 |
73.3 |
-2.7 |
|
|
|
| |
|