The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAYTON - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-15-02 |
vs TENNESSEE TECH |
-12.5 |
141.5 |
59-68 |
L |
L |
Un |
41.5% |
19.2% |
50.0% |
33 |
45.8% |
40.9% |
88.2% |
29 |
3-13-02 |
vs DETROIT |
-11 |
130.5 |
80-69 |
W |
P |
Ov |
51.5% |
46.7% |
45.5% |
44 |
41.7% |
35.0% |
70.6% |
31 |
3-8-02 |
vs XAVIER |
-1.5 |
134.5 |
59-66 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.5% |
31.3% |
66.7% |
34 |
48.9% |
40.0% |
72.7% |
35 |
3-7-02 |
vs ST JOSEPHS |
PK |
144.5 |
81-74 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.1% |
29.4% |
68.6% |
41 |
40.0% |
27.8% |
70.8% |
40 |
3-6-02 |
vs RHODE ISLAND |
-15.5 |
132 |
90-71 |
W |
W |
Ov |
54.2% |
42.1% |
54.5% |
36 |
48.1% |
41.2% |
66.7% |
31 |
3-2-02 |
vs LASALLE |
-15 |
NL |
95-72 |
W |
W |
- |
47.1% |
45.5% |
77.8% |
42 |
38.3% |
21.4% |
85.2% |
33 |
February 2002 |
2-27-02 |
vs TEMPLE |
-6.5 |
NL |
70-75 |
L |
L |
- |
37.9% |
39.3% |
81.8% |
41 |
44.3% |
38.1% |
86.7% |
36 |
2-23-02 |
at ST JOSEPHS |
+2 |
142.5 |
68-70 |
L |
P |
Un |
45.2% |
31.8% |
50.0% |
34 |
51.1% |
46.7% |
68.0% |
30 |
2-21-02 |
at GEORGE WASHINGTON |
-8 |
NL |
89-59 |
W |
W |
- |
51.8% |
40.0% |
72.4% |
46 |
27.9% |
26.3% |
66.7% |
35 |
2-16-02 |
vs RHODE ISLAND |
-21 |
NL |
66-57 |
W |
L |
- |
46.8% |
16.7% |
87.0% |
29 |
47.1% |
40.0% |
60.0% |
26 |
2-13-02 |
vs DUQUESNE |
-20 |
NL |
82-50 |
W |
W |
- |
42.9% |
47.6% |
70.6% |
43 |
31.4% |
33.3% |
66.7% |
31 |
2-10-02 |
at RICHMOND |
-2.5 |
NL |
54-63 |
L |
L |
- |
34.4% |
28.0% |
45.5% |
38 |
52.5% |
31.3% |
66.7% |
29 |
2-6-02 |
at FORDHAM |
-7 |
NL |
92-78 |
W |
W |
- |
49.2% |
42.3% |
70.8% |
35 |
54.4% |
20.0% |
63.6% |
30 |
2-3-02 |
vs ST BONAVENTURE |
-8.5 |
NL |
75-81 |
L |
L |
- |
48.0% |
34.8% |
67.9% |
40 |
46.4% |
39.3% |
81.8% |
22 |
January 2002 |
1-29-02 |
at MASSACHUSETTS |
-2.5 |
NL |
83-68 |
W |
W |
- |
58.5% |
41.7% |
69.8% |
44 |
35.9% |
42.9% |
66.7% |
22 |
1-26-02 |
at XAVIER |
+4.5 |
131 |
59-75 |
L |
L |
Ov |
34.4% |
30.0% |
73.3% |
36 |
47.1% |
27.3% |
80.0% |
33 |
1-23-02 |
at LASALLE |
-6 |
NL |
71-69 |
W |
L |
- |
41.9% |
29.7% |
47.1% |
32 |
47.9% |
22.2% |
84.0% |
30 |
1-19-02 |
vs RICHMOND |
-12.5 |
NL |
68-52 |
W |
W |
- |
43.3% |
33.3% |
47.6% |
52 |
35.6% |
21.4% |
50.0% |
29 |
1-12-02 |
at DUQUESNE |
-10 |
NL |
88-44 |
W |
W |
- |
56.4% |
54.2% |
86.7% |
40 |
29.8% |
31.6% |
80.0% |
25 |
1-9-02 |
vs GEORGE WASHINGTON |
-12 |
NL |
83-59 |
W |
W |
- |
48.2% |
45.8% |
60.0% |
48 |
29.5% |
26.9% |
72.7% |
34 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
32 |
21-11 (65.6%) |
15-15-2 (50.0%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
73.1 |
63.8 |
+9.3 |
17 |
13-4 (76.5%) |
8-8-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
74.1 |
60.1 |
+13.9 |
12 |
6-6 (50.0%) |
5-6-1 (45.5%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
70.8 |
67.3 |
+3.6 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
76.7 |
70.3 |
+6.3 |
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
76.7 |
70.3 |
+6.3 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-1-1 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
69.5 |
68.5 |
+1.0 |
32 |
21-11 (65.6%) |
15-15-2 (50.0%) |
4-3-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
73.1 |
63.8 |
+9.3 |
26 |
19-7 (73.1%) |
13-12-1 (52.0%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
74.7 |
61.5 |
+13.2 |
5 |
1-4 (20.0%) |
1-3-1 (25.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
63.2 |
73.4 |
-10.2 |
17 |
13-4 (76.5%) |
8-8-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
74.1 |
60.1 |
+13.9 |
7 |
5-2 (71.4%) |
4-3-0 (57.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
76.3 |
62.9 |
+13.4 |
5 |
1-4 (20.0%) |
1-3-1 (25.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
63.2 |
73.4 |
-10.2 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
70.0 |
70.0 |
0.0 |
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
0-1-1 (0.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
63.5 |
69.0 |
-5.5 |
12 |
10-2 (83.3%) |
7-5-0 (58.3%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
78.8 |
61.7 |
+17.2 |
16 |
10-6 (62.5%) |
7-8-1 (46.7%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
70.4 |
63.9 |
+6.5 |
21 |
12-9 (57.1%) |
8-12-1 (40.0%) |
3-3-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
69.7 |
63.4 |
+6.3 |
10 |
8-2 (80.0%) |
6-3-1 (66.7%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
80.7 |
65.9 |
+14.8 |
15 |
8-7 (53.3%) |
5-9-1 (35.7%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
69.6 |
64.7 |
+4.9 |
14 |
12-2 (85.7%) |
9-4-1 (69.2%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
78.4 |
62.6 |
+15.8 |
|
|
|
| |
|