The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAVIDSON - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-14-02 |
vs OHIO ST |
+13 |
134.5 |
64-69 |
L |
W |
Un |
45.5% |
26.7% |
58.8% |
39 |
40.3% |
28.6% |
83.3% |
33 |
3-3-02 |
vs FURMAN |
-4 |
126 |
62-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
51.2% |
36.8% |
68.8% |
34 |
39.6% |
45.5% |
76.9% |
24 |
3-2-02 |
vs UNC-GREENSBORO |
+2.5 |
NL |
68-58 |
W |
W |
- |
41.2% |
28.6% |
71.4% |
42 |
36.7% |
18.2% |
62.5% |
33 |
3-1-02 |
vs THE CITADEL |
+1.5 |
NL |
71-58 |
W |
W |
- |
47.3% |
33.3% |
68.4% |
43 |
33.3% |
34.8% |
63.2% |
28 |
February 2002 |
2-23-02 |
at VMI |
-3 |
NL |
77-81 |
L |
L |
- |
48.4% |
30.4% |
47.1% |
42 |
39.3% |
37.5% |
77.4% |
38 |
2-19-02 |
at COLL OF CHARLESTON |
+9.5 |
NL |
73-70 |
W |
W |
- |
46.4% |
28.6% |
75.0% |
37 |
48.3% |
37.5% |
54.5% |
32 |
2-16-02 |
vs APPALACHIAN ST |
-8.5 |
NL |
60-62 |
L |
L |
- |
39.7% |
43.3% |
33.3% |
36 |
45.6% |
23.5% |
54.5% |
35 |
2-13-02 |
vs GA SOUTHERN |
-5 |
NL |
64-56 |
W |
W |
- |
41.0% |
18.2% |
83.3% |
44 |
37.1% |
18.2% |
66.7% |
34 |
2-9-02 |
at E TENN ST |
+6.5 |
NL |
78-85 |
L |
L |
- |
50.9% |
52.6% |
77.8% |
30 |
35.6% |
23.5% |
92.9% |
37 |
2-5-02 |
vs UNC-GREENSBORO |
-2.5 |
NL |
53-48 |
W |
W |
- |
30.4% |
25.0% |
82.4% |
38 |
29.6% |
43.8% |
64.3% |
44 |
2-2-02 |
at APPALACHIAN ST |
PK |
NL |
82-72 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
41.2% |
63.0% |
38 |
34.5% |
38.1% |
89.7% |
34 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
vs WOFFORD |
-6 |
NL |
72-61 |
W |
W |
- |
39.2% |
33.3% |
85.7% |
39 |
35.5% |
23.8% |
66.7% |
38 |
1-26-02 |
vs W CAROLINA |
-10 |
NL |
67-70 |
L |
L |
- |
43.1% |
30.3% |
63.6% |
30 |
38.3% |
40.0% |
64.0% |
45 |
1-23-02 |
at UNC-GREENSBORO |
+6.5 |
NL |
58-57 |
W |
W |
- |
42.0% |
36.4% |
66.7% |
36 |
37.5% |
33.3% |
60.0% |
35 |
1-19-02 |
vs E TENN ST |
-2 |
NL |
73-66 |
W |
W |
- |
51.7% |
38.1% |
50.0% |
35 |
42.4% |
21.4% |
59.1% |
35 |
1-16-02 |
vs VMI |
-12 |
NL |
79-68 |
W |
L |
- |
39.4% |
37.0% |
65.4% |
47 |
33.3% |
21.4% |
77.8% |
46 |
1-12-02 |
at FURMAN |
+2 |
NL |
73-70 |
W |
W |
- |
42.6% |
48.1% |
71.4% |
32 |
44.1% |
46.2% |
66.7% |
29 |
1-8-02 |
vs UT-CHATTANOOGA |
-2.5 |
NL |
63-61 |
W |
L |
- |
32.9% |
36.7% |
50.0% |
40 |
39.1% |
20.0% |
61.5% |
50 |
1-5-02 |
at W CAROLINA |
-3 |
NL |
74-71 |
W |
P |
- |
46.4% |
47.8% |
50.0% |
46 |
35.0% |
40.0% |
100.0% |
29 |
1-2-02 |
vs DUKE |
+27 |
NL |
71-106 |
L |
L |
- |
39.0% |
45.5% |
83.3% |
30 |
47.8% |
41.4% |
75.7% |
45 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
31 |
21-10 (67.7%) |
16-9-1 (64.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.7 |
66.0 |
+4.7 |
13 |
11-2 (84.6%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
74.5 |
59.3 |
+15.2 |
12 |
7-5 (58.3%) |
8-3-1 (72.7%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.3 |
70.3 |
-2.1 |
6 |
3-3 (50.0%) |
4-2-0 (66.7%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.5 |
71.8 |
-4.3 |
3 |
3-0 (100.0%) |
3-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.0 |
57.7 |
+9.3 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
64.0 |
69.0 |
-5.0 |
31 |
21-10 (67.7%) |
16-9-1 (64.0%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.7 |
66.0 |
+4.7 |
11 |
8-3 (72.7%) |
5-5-1 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.6 |
63.7 |
+3.9 |
14 |
7-7 (50.0%) |
10-4-0 (71.4%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.4 |
71.0 |
-4.6 |
8 |
6-2 (75.0%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
66.4 |
61.5 |
+4.9 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-1-1 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
75.5 |
76.0 |
-0.5 |
9 |
5-4 (55.6%) |
7-2-0 (77.8%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
65.1 |
68.9 |
-3.8 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
65.0 |
57.5 |
+7.5 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.0 |
65.0 |
+15.0 |
11 |
9-2 (81.8%) |
5-3-1 (62.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.7 |
63.2 |
+9.5 |
16 |
9-7 (56.3%) |
9-5-0 (64.3%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
68.9 |
69.1 |
-0.3 |
21 |
13-8 (61.9%) |
8-9-0 (47.1%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.1 |
67.3 |
+3.8 |
9 |
8-1 (88.9%) |
7-0-1 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.0 |
63.0 |
+9.0 |
15 |
10-5 (66.7%) |
7-5-0 (58.3%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
73.1 |
61.5 |
+11.6 |
9 |
8-1 (88.9%) |
8-0-1 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
71.7 |
66.9 |
+4.8 |
|
|
|
| |
|