The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLEMSON Tigers23-9 |
|
|
Upcoming Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
ACC Standings for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
N CAROLINA |
34 |
4 |
0.895 |
18 |
19 |
0 |
48.6% |
89.8 |
72.0 |
14-1 |
20-3 |
DUKE |
30 |
7 |
0.811 |
16 |
18 |
2 |
47.1% |
77.5 |
65.9 |
16-1 |
14-6 |
WAKE FOREST |
24 |
7 |
0.774 |
15 |
12 |
0 |
55.6% |
81.0 |
70.7 |
14-1 |
10-6 |
CLEMSON |
23 |
9 |
0.719 |
12 |
14 |
1 |
46.2% |
78.3 |
68.0 |
13-3 |
10-6 |
FLORIDA ST |
25 |
10 |
0.714 |
18 |
10 |
1 |
64.3% |
68.3 |
64.9 |
13-3 |
12-7 |
BOSTON COLLEGE |
22 |
12 |
0.647 |
15 |
13 |
1 |
53.6% |
74.4 |
70.5 |
15-4 |
7-8 |
MARYLAND |
21 |
14 |
0.600 |
16 |
12 |
1 |
57.1% |
71.8 |
69.1 |
14-4 |
7-10 |
MIAMI |
19 |
13 |
0.594 |
13 |
13 |
1 |
50.0% |
72.7 |
66.3 |
12-4 |
7-9 |
VIRGINIA TECH |
19 |
15 |
0.559 |
13 |
16 |
0 |
44.8% |
72.6 |
70.7 |
10-6 |
9-9 |
NC STATE |
16 |
14 |
0.533 |
15 |
9 |
1 |
62.5% |
73.0 |
69.6 |
14-4 |
2-10 |
GEORGIA TECH |
12 |
19 |
0.387 |
11 |
16 |
0 |
40.7% |
71.2 |
71.5 |
9-8 |
3-11 |
VIRGINIA |
10 |
18 |
0.357 |
10 |
13 |
0 |
43.5% |
70.0 |
72.5 |
9-8 |
1-10 |
|
Current Injuries |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2008-2009 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2009 |
3-19-09 |
vs MICHIGAN |
-4.5 |
139 |
59-62 |
L |
L |
Un |
32.3% |
22.7% |
85.7% |
44 |
39.2% |
38.5% |
80.0% |
33 |
3-12-09 |
vs GEORGIA TECH |
-8.5 |
143.5 |
81-86 |
L |
L |
Ov |
47.0% |
35.7% |
52.9% |
32 |
55.7% |
37.5% |
75.0% |
38 |
3-8-09 |
at WAKE FOREST |
+5.5 |
155 |
88-96 |
L |
L |
Ov |
50.8% |
40.7% |
73.3% |
26 |
59.6% |
40.0% |
80.0% |
38 |
3-3-09 |
vs VIRGINIA |
-14 |
145.5 |
75-57 |
W |
W |
Un |
50.0% |
25.0% |
76.0% |
36 |
40.8% |
30.0% |
63.6% |
27 |
February 2009 |
2-28-09 |
at FLORIDA ST |
-1 |
140 |
66-73 |
L |
L |
Un |
43.1% |
42.9% |
50.0% |
37 |
46.4% |
41.2% |
66.7% |
32 |
2-25-09 |
vs VIRGINIA TECH |
-10 |
145 |
77-80 |
L |
L |
Ov |
42.2% |
35.0% |
69.6% |
41 |
43.3% |
57.9% |
58.6% |
39 |
2-22-09 |
at GEORGIA TECH |
-7 |
146.5 |
81-73 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.9% |
52.2% |
71.4% |
32 |
50.9% |
54.5% |
56.5% |
28 |
2-17-09 |
vs MARYLAND |
-10.5 |
145.5 |
93-64 |
W |
W |
Ov |
57.8% |
46.2% |
77.8% |
37 |
38.3% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
33 |
2-15-09 |
at VIRGINIA |
-8 |
145 |
81-85 |
L |
L |
Ov |
43.1% |
34.6% |
76.2% |
37 |
53.1% |
46.7% |
62.5% |
30 |
2-10-09 |
at BOSTON COLLEGE |
-4 |
148.5 |
87-77 |
W |
W |
Ov |
44.8% |
44.0% |
69.6% |
38 |
48.2% |
35.7% |
72.0% |
35 |
2-7-09 |
vs FLORIDA ST |
-9 |
139.5 |
61-65 |
L |
L |
Un |
45.3% |
25.0% |
77.8% |
28 |
40.7% |
35.0% |
71.4% |
36 |
2-4-09 |
vs DUKE |
+4.5 |
145.5 |
74-47 |
W |
W |
Un |
46.7% |
35.0% |
68.8% |
41 |
30.8% |
23.1% |
63.2% |
30 |
January 2009 |
1-29-09 |
at VIRGINIA TECH |
-1 |
141.5 |
86-82 |
W |
W |
Ov |
43.3% |
56.0% |
66.7% |
39 |
50.8% |
36.8% |
75.0% |
32 |
1-25-09 |
vs GEORGIA TECH |
-13 |
146 |
73-59 |
W |
W |
Un |
37.5% |
34.8% |
74.2% |
40 |
40.4% |
21.4% |
71.4% |
36 |
1-21-09 |
at N CAROLINA |
+13 |
162 |
70-94 |
L |
L |
Ov |
35.3% |
40.9% |
68.4% |
39 |
53.0% |
31.3% |
70.4% |
41 |
1-17-09 |
vs WAKE FOREST |
-2.5 |
155 |
68-78 |
L |
L |
Un |
33.8% |
21.7% |
55.0% |
39 |
48.2% |
22.2% |
78.6% |
48 |
1-10-09 |
vs NC STATE |
-12 |
141.5 |
63-51 |
W |
P |
Un |
42.9% |
33.3% |
65.0% |
35 |
31.5% |
33.3% |
73.3% |
40 |
1-6-09 |
vs ALABAMA |
-15 |
147.5 |
66-59 |
W |
L |
Un |
39.7% |
35.0% |
59.1% |
35 |
37.1% |
21.1% |
75.0% |
46 |
1-3-09 |
vs E CAROLINA |
-24 |
157 |
79-66 |
W |
L |
Un |
42.4% |
29.0% |
66.7% |
38 |
43.6% |
41.7% |
80.0% |
33 |
December 2008 |
12-30-08 |
at S CAROLINA |
-2.5 |
152.5 |
98-87 |
W |
W |
Ov |
55.4% |
47.6% |
80.0% |
38 |
47.7% |
33.3% |
70.0% |
33 |
12-21-08 |
at MIAMI |
+2.5 |
146.5 |
91-72 |
W |
W |
Ov |
49.3% |
36.4% |
72.2% |
36 |
46.6% |
40.0% |
44.4% |
44 |
12-16-08 |
vs N FLORIDA |
NL |
NL |
76-36 |
W |
- |
- |
45.3% |
28.6% |
63.2% |
45 |
25.9% |
18.2% |
40.0% |
37 |
12-13-08 |
vs S CAROLINA ST |
NL |
NL |
90-63 |
W |
- |
- |
54.0% |
38.1% |
73.7% |
37 |
36.2% |
33.3% |
70.8% |
36 |
12-7-08 |
vs LIBERTY |
NL |
NL |
80-75 |
W |
- |
- |
50.8% |
38.1% |
80.0% |
31 |
50.0% |
47.4% |
80.0% |
30 |
12-2-08 |
at ILLINOIS |
-1 |
134 |
76-74 |
W |
W |
Ov |
57.9% |
28.6% |
46.2% |
23 |
51.7% |
27.8% |
87.5% |
35 |
November 2008 |
11-28-08 |
vs PRESBYTERIAN |
NL |
NL |
79-58 |
W |
- |
- |
53.4% |
35.7% |
70.6% |
38 |
46.9% |
35.0% |
38.5% |
25 |
11-25-08 |
vs SAVANNAH ST |
NL |
NL |
81-49 |
W |
- |
- |
50.8% |
42.9% |
61.9% |
47 |
32.8% |
42.9% |
71.4% |
28 |
11-22-08 |
at CHARLOTTE |
-4 |
147 |
71-70 |
W |
L |
Un |
41.8% |
33.3% |
58.1% |
41 |
42.2% |
39.1% |
36.8% |
42 |
11-19-08 |
vs WOFFORD |
-23.5 |
138 |
93-40 |
W |
W |
Un |
52.3% |
37.5% |
88.9% |
39 |
27.1% |
11.8% |
70.6% |
30 |
11-16-08 |
vs TEMPLE |
-7.5 |
143.5 |
76-72 |
W |
L |
Ov |
47.4% |
39.1% |
72.2% |
41 |
45.0% |
41.7% |
100.0% |
26 |
11-15-08 |
vs TCU |
-17 |
139.5 |
70-58 |
W |
L |
Un |
46.9% |
43.8% |
73.9% |
33 |
37.7% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
37 |
11-14-08 |
vs HOFSTRA |
-17.5 |
147 |
98-69 |
W |
W |
Ov |
50.8% |
52.9% |
64.1% |
48 |
31.8% |
33.3% |
59.4% |
46 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-2009 Season Season |
32 |
23-9 (71.9%) |
12-14-1 (46.2%) |
14-13-0 |
51.9% |
48.1% |
78.3 |
68.0 |
+10.3 |
16 |
13-3 (81.3%) |
5-5-1 (50.0%) |
2-9-0 |
18.2% |
81.8% |
76.8 |
59.2 |
+17.6 |
11 |
7-4 (63.6%) |
6-5-0 (54.5%) |
9-2-0 |
81.8% |
18.2% |
81.4 |
80.3 |
+1.1 |
5 |
3-2 (60.0%) |
1-4-0 (20.0%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
76.8 |
69.4 |
+7.4 |
4 |
3-1 (75.0%) |
1-3-0 (25.0%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
81.3 |
71.3 |
+10.0 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
59.0 |
62.0 |
-3.0 |
17 |
9-8 (52.9%) |
8-8-1 (50.0%) |
10-7-0 |
58.8% |
41.2% |
77.4 |
72.9 |
+4.5 |
15 |
14-1 (93.3%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
4-6-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
79.5 |
62.5 |
+16.9 |
23 |
16-7 (69.6%) |
10-12-1 (45.5%) |
11-12-0 |
47.8% |
52.2% |
77.3 |
69.0 |
+8.3 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
2-2-0 (50.0%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
80.8 |
77.3 |
+3.5 |
10 |
7-3 (70.0%) |
4-5-1 (44.4%) |
2-8-0 |
20.0% |
80.0% |
74.8 |
61.9 |
+12.9 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
74.0 |
47.0 |
+27.0 |
8 |
6-2 (75.0%) |
5-3-0 (62.5%) |
6-2-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
80.8 |
77.6 |
+3.1 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
1-2-0 (33.3%) |
3-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
83.0 |
87.3 |
-4.3 |
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
0-2-0 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.0 |
65.0 |
+8.0 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
93.0 |
64.0 |
+29.0 |
11 |
8-3 (72.7%) |
3-5-0 (37.5%) |
2-6-0 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
75.6 |
60.4 |
+15.3 |
18 |
12-6 (66.7%) |
8-7-1 (53.3%) |
10-6-0 |
62.5% |
37.5% |
79.8 |
73.3 |
+6.5 |
23 |
18-5 (78.3%) |
7-10-1 (41.2%) |
9-9-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
78.5 |
66.8 |
+11.7 |
8 |
4-4 (50.0%) |
4-4-0 (50.0%) |
4-4-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
75.5 |
71.5 |
+4.0 |
12 |
8-4 (66.7%) |
4-7-0 (36.4%) |
6-5-0 |
54.5% |
45.5% |
78.8 |
73.7 |
+5.2 |
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
5-6-1 (45.5%) |
5-7-0 |
41.7% |
58.3% |
75.6 |
64.8 |
+10.8 |
|
|
|
| |
|