The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C MICHIGAN - |
|
|
Last 20 Games for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-7-02 |
vs TOLEDO |
+2.5 |
130.5 |
54-62 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.2% |
9.1% |
79.4% |
31 |
37.7% |
33.3% |
65.4% |
30 |
3-4-02 |
at OHIO U |
+9.5 |
NL |
65-56 |
W |
W |
- |
44.7% |
33.3% |
75.0% |
40 |
39.3% |
24.0% |
46.2% |
30 |
3-2-02 |
vs BALL ST |
+4.5 |
NL |
77-81 |
L |
W |
- |
50.0% |
35.7% |
69.6% |
34 |
39.7% |
25.9% |
77.4% |
41 |
February 2002 |
2-27-02 |
at MARSHALL |
+4 |
NL |
57-82 |
L |
L |
- |
35.1% |
13.3% |
55.6% |
28 |
56.4% |
46.7% |
54.2% |
45 |
2-23-02 |
at N ILLINOIS |
+1.5 |
NL |
70-80 |
L |
L |
- |
48.1% |
33.3% |
57.7% |
38 |
48.1% |
56.3% |
67.7% |
30 |
2-20-02 |
vs E MICHIGAN |
-14 |
NL |
76-57 |
W |
W |
- |
52.5% |
41.7% |
63.6% |
42 |
33.3% |
18.2% |
63.0% |
34 |
2-16-02 |
at BUFFALO |
+2.5 |
NL |
57-69 |
L |
L |
- |
51.2% |
28.6% |
64.3% |
26 |
44.9% |
50.0% |
65.0% |
31 |
2-13-02 |
at OHIO U |
+7 |
NL |
50-64 |
L |
L |
- |
40.8% |
20.0% |
72.7% |
28 |
50.0% |
36.4% |
58.8% |
34 |
2-9-02 |
vs KENT ST |
+5 |
NL |
66-96 |
L |
L |
- |
50.0% |
16.7% |
66.7% |
21 |
63.3% |
64.3% |
84.6% |
32 |
2-6-02 |
at TOLEDO |
+2.5 |
NL |
42-58 |
L |
L |
- |
31.9% |
12.5% |
64.7% |
34 |
39.1% |
40.0% |
66.7% |
36 |
2-4-02 |
vs W MICHIGAN |
-4 |
NL |
70-67 |
W |
L |
- |
48.9% |
36.4% |
74.1% |
37 |
44.6% |
33.3% |
71.4% |
25 |
2-2-02 |
vs N ILLINOIS |
-9.5 |
NL |
91-93 |
L |
L |
- |
61.9% |
57.1% |
67.3% |
33 |
51.7% |
46.2% |
67.9% |
28 |
January 2002 |
1-26-02 |
at AKRON |
-3 |
NL |
73-83 |
L |
L |
- |
50.0% |
18.8% |
55.6% |
35 |
54.8% |
50.0% |
74.4% |
19 |
1-22-02 |
vs TOLEDO |
-5.5 |
NL |
75-61 |
W |
W |
- |
50.0% |
42.9% |
73.3% |
39 |
45.7% |
41.2% |
60.0% |
25 |
1-19-02 |
at E MICHIGAN |
-8.5 |
NL |
86-73 |
W |
W |
- |
52.5% |
47.4% |
75.0% |
33 |
44.0% |
28.6% |
73.5% |
33 |
1-16-02 |
vs MARSHALL |
-4 |
NL |
88-84 |
W |
P |
- |
55.6% |
70.6% |
55.2% |
28 |
60.4% |
55.0% |
83.3% |
24 |
1-12-02 |
at W MICHIGAN |
+1 |
NL |
67-81 |
L |
L |
- |
45.8% |
12.5% |
70.0% |
35 |
43.9% |
23.8% |
72.0% |
39 |
1-9-02 |
at BALL ST |
+12 |
NL |
77-89 |
L |
P |
- |
40.0% |
21.1% |
80.8% |
36 |
48.3% |
37.5% |
84.6% |
39 |
1-5-02 |
vs MIAMI OHIO |
-4 |
NL |
94-100 |
L |
L |
- |
44.1% |
34.8% |
77.3% |
35 |
45.9% |
36.4% |
61.5% |
53 |
1-3-02 |
vs BOWLING GREEN |
+1 |
NL |
81-82 |
L |
P |
- |
47.0% |
27.3% |
68.4% |
35 |
53.7% |
61.1% |
65.0% |
33 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
28 |
9-19 (32.1%) |
5-18-3 (21.7%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.0 |
74.0 |
-4.0 |
13 |
7-6 (53.8%) |
3-6-2 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
78.2 |
75.0 |
+3.2 |
14 |
2-12 (14.3%) |
2-11-1 (15.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
63.6 |
73.9 |
-10.3 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
54.0 |
62.0 |
-8.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
59.5 |
59.0 |
+0.5 |
28 |
9-19 (32.1%) |
5-18-3 (21.7%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.0 |
74.0 |
-4.0 |
9 |
6-3 (66.7%) |
3-5-1 (37.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.3 |
76.7 |
+4.7 |
17 |
1-16 (5.9%) |
2-13-2 (13.3%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
63.4 |
75.1 |
-11.7 |
7 |
5-2 (71.4%) |
2-4-1 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.9 |
76.3 |
+5.6 |
4 |
0-4 (0.0%) |
1-2-1 (33.3%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.0 |
84.0 |
-11.0 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
79.5 |
78.0 |
+1.5 |
12 |
1-11 (8.3%) |
1-10-1 (9.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
60.9 |
73.2 |
-12.3 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
1-3-0 (25.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
67.8 |
70.3 |
-2.5 |
11 |
3-8 (27.3%) |
3-7-0 (30.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.9 |
72.8 |
-4.9 |
13 |
4-9 (30.8%) |
1-8-3 (11.1%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.5 |
76.1 |
-3.6 |
9 |
2-7 (22.2%) |
2-7-0 (22.2%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
64.8 |
71.6 |
-6.8 |
18 |
6-12 (33.3%) |
3-11-3 (21.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.3 |
76.3 |
-4.0 |
5 |
2-3 (40.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
67.4 |
68.4 |
-1.0 |
17 |
5-12 (29.4%) |
2-11-3 (15.4%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
68.9 |
74.1 |
-5.2 |
|
|
|
| |
|