The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARKANSAS - |
|
|
All Games YTD for the 2001-2002 Season |
Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
March 2002 |
3-7-02 |
vs TENNESSEE |
PK |
141 |
61-68 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.5% |
19.0% |
71.4% |
30 |
39.2% |
26.1% |
73.3% |
43 |
3-2-02 |
vs VANDERBILT |
-8.5 |
NL |
81-67 |
W |
W |
- |
47.5% |
38.5% |
65.2% |
29 |
41.8% |
36.0% |
75.0% |
39 |
February 2002 |
2-27-02 |
at MISSISSIPPI ST |
+6 |
NL |
83-89 |
L |
P |
- |
45.9% |
46.4% |
82.4% |
21 |
49.1% |
26.3% |
71.1% |
46 |
2-23-02 |
at KENTUCKY |
+12 |
146.5 |
58-71 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.9% |
23.8% |
42.9% |
35 |
45.3% |
36.8% |
80.0% |
39 |
2-20-02 |
vs ALABAMA |
PK |
NL |
67-59 |
W |
W |
- |
38.5% |
40.0% |
63.6% |
39 |
25.0% |
25.0% |
76.9% |
43 |
2-16-02 |
vs LSU |
-8.5 |
NL |
63-67 |
L |
L |
- |
36.1% |
24.1% |
63.2% |
35 |
46.9% |
41.2% |
63.6% |
39 |
2-13-02 |
at TENNESSEE |
+3 |
NL |
53-64 |
L |
L |
- |
33.3% |
28.0% |
57.1% |
31 |
45.0% |
36.8% |
84.0% |
36 |
2-9-02 |
at MISSISSIPPI |
+4 |
NL |
67-79 |
L |
L |
- |
47.3% |
38.9% |
53.3% |
28 |
53.8% |
45.0% |
82.4% |
27 |
2-2-02 |
vs AUBURN |
-9.5 |
NL |
62-60 |
W |
L |
- |
42.3% |
23.5% |
66.7% |
22 |
44.2% |
26.3% |
64.3% |
42 |
January 2002 |
1-30-02 |
at ALABAMA |
+7 |
NL |
94-109 |
L |
L |
- |
46.3% |
36.7% |
72.4% |
39 |
52.2% |
44.8% |
68.4% |
39 |
1-26-02 |
vs FLORIDA |
+6 |
160.5 |
94-92 |
W |
W |
Ov |
47.8% |
40.7% |
70.4% |
31 |
45.5% |
32.1% |
56.1% |
51 |
1-23-02 |
at GEORGIA |
+3 |
NL |
67-81 |
L |
L |
- |
34.7% |
24.0% |
68.8% |
38 |
41.0% |
17.6% |
90.3% |
48 |
1-19-02 |
vs MISSISSIPPI |
-7 |
NL |
64-70 |
L |
L |
- |
41.4% |
30.8% |
53.3% |
27 |
44.2% |
28.6% |
60.0% |
46 |
1-16-02 |
vs S CAROLINA |
-6 |
NL |
60-62 |
L |
L |
- |
39.5% |
40.0% |
75.0% |
25 |
45.5% |
38.9% |
71.4% |
36 |
1-13-02 |
at LSU |
+1 |
NL |
69-75 |
L |
L |
- |
41.4% |
41.9% |
80.0% |
34 |
45.2% |
46.2% |
81.6% |
27 |
1-8-02 |
vs MISSISSIPPI ST |
-8 |
155 |
75-64 |
W |
W |
Un |
44.6% |
35.7% |
43.8% |
35 |
37.3% |
28.6% |
60.9% |
46 |
1-5-02 |
at AUBURN |
-1 |
NL |
83-77 |
W |
W |
- |
52.6% |
36.0% |
63.6% |
32 |
45.5% |
43.5% |
51.5% |
41 |
1-2-02 |
at MEMPHIS |
+7.5 |
156 |
90-73 |
W |
W |
Ov |
47.7% |
36.4% |
74.1% |
37 |
40.4% |
31.3% |
66.7% |
37 |
December 2001 |
12-29-01 |
vs ELON |
NL |
NL |
96-52 |
W |
- |
- |
49.3% |
32.0% |
62.5% |
37 |
27.9% |
26.7% |
62.5% |
51 |
12-22-01 |
vs OKLAHOMA ST |
+2 |
NL |
76-85 |
L |
L |
- |
45.9% |
34.5% |
55.6% |
22 |
56.5% |
40.0% |
70.7% |
40 |
12-20-01 |
vs UT-CHATTANOOGA |
-15.5 |
NL |
98-84 |
W |
L |
- |
47.2% |
37.5% |
66.7% |
39 |
44.3% |
37.5% |
59.1% |
44 |
12-10-01 |
vs UNC-GREENSBORO |
-15 |
NL |
89-74 |
W |
P |
- |
50.8% |
26.3% |
72.7% |
31 |
34.5% |
48.0% |
81.5% |
38 |
12-8-01 |
at ILLINOIS |
+11 |
144.5 |
91-94 |
L |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
38.7% |
61.9% |
27 |
49.1% |
27.8% |
75.5% |
46 |
12-4-01 |
vs SW TEXAS ST |
NL |
NL |
90-68 |
W |
- |
- |
44.4% |
46.9% |
68.8% |
37 |
40.0% |
40.0% |
62.5% |
43 |
November 2001 |
11-30-01 |
vs OKLAHOMA |
-3.5 |
134 |
54-69 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.9% |
13.3% |
62.5% |
24 |
44.1% |
26.7% |
81.3% |
42 |
11-28-01 |
at TULSA |
+6 |
NL |
79-75 |
W |
W |
- |
51.7% |
30.0% |
78.6% |
32 |
37.9% |
19.0% |
77.1% |
38 |
11-18-01 |
vs ORAL ROBERTS |
NL |
NL |
71-57 |
W |
- |
- |
51.9% |
28.6% |
50.0% |
37 |
39.0% |
26.3% |
60.0% |
34 |
11-16-01 |
vs WAKE FOREST |
-3.5 |
146.5 |
71-76 |
L |
L |
Ov |
35.6% |
25.0% |
61.8% |
35 |
49.0% |
33.3% |
62.5% |
40 |
11-12-01 |
vs MAINE |
-23.5 |
NL |
64-47 |
W |
L |
- |
36.5% |
27.8% |
45.5% |
40 |
35.4% |
18.2% |
45.8% |
42 |
|
Game Situation Report for the 2001-2002 Season Season |
29 |
14-15 (48.3%) |
8-16-2 (33.3%) |
4-4-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
74.8 |
72.7 |
+2.1 |
17 |
11-6 (64.7%) |
4-9-1 (30.8%) |
2-2-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
75.0 |
67.8 |
+7.2 |
11 |
3-8 (27.3%) |
4-6-1 (40.0%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
75.8 |
80.6 |
-4.8 |
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
61.0 |
68.0 |
-7.0 |
3 |
1-2 (33.3%) |
0-3-0 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
65.3 |
63.7 |
+1.7 |
29 |
14-15 (48.3%) |
8-16-2 (33.3%) |
4-4-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
74.8 |
72.7 |
+2.1 |
12 |
7-5 (58.3%) |
3-8-1 (27.3%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
72.0 |
68.1 |
+3.9 |
12 |
3-9 (25.0%) |
4-7-1 (36.4%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
76.8 |
82.3 |
-5.5 |
11 |
6-5 (54.5%) |
2-8-1 (20.0%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
71.0 |
67.3 |
+3.7 |
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
85.0 |
88.5 |
-3.5 |
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
83.0 |
77.0 |
+6.0 |
10 |
2-8 (20.0%) |
3-6-1 (33.3%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
75.1 |
81.0 |
-5.9 |
4 |
2-2 (50.0%) |
0-2-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
72.5 |
71.3 |
+1.3 |
9 |
5-4 (55.6%) |
4-5-0 (44.4%) |
1-2-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
71.1 |
70.0 |
+1.1 |
16 |
7-9 (43.8%) |
4-9-1 (30.8%) |
3-1-0 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
77.5 |
74.6 |
+2.9 |
14 |
5-9 (35.7%) |
5-9-0 (35.7%) |
3-4-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
76.1 |
78.5 |
-2.4 |
14 |
8-6 (57.1%) |
3-6-2 (33.3%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
74.3 |
68.7 |
+5.6 |
8 |
3-5 (37.5%) |
2-5-1 (28.6%) |
0-4-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
72.9 |
75.9 |
-3.0 |
15 |
6-9 (40.0%) |
2-9-1 (18.2%) |
2-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
72.3 |
70.7 |
+1.5 |
|
|
|
| |
|