| Important Message - Daily Racing Form/Affinity Gaming will be permanently shutting down StatFox on 6/30/2024. |
| Valued StatFox Customers: We are thrilled to refer you to our friends at StatSharp, launching just in time for the 2024 football season! As StatFox closes its doors, we encourage you to bookmark www.statsharp.com and stay tuned for their launch. StatSharp's cutting-edge platform will offer power ratings, game simulations, betting systems, in-depth trends for teams and player, and much more to elevate your sports betting experience. Discover the advanced insights and analytics at StatSharp, with even more precision and innovation.
|
|
The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
BOISE ST Broncos19-13 |
|
|
Upcoming Games
for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
|
WAC Standings for the 2008-2009 Season |
|
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
|
UTAH ST |
30 |
5 |
0.857 |
17 |
12 |
0 |
58.6% |
72.4 |
62.0 |
17-0 |
13-5 |
|
NEVADA |
21 |
13 |
0.618 |
11 |
20 |
1 |
35.5% |
70.6 |
66.1 |
13-8 |
8-5 |
|
BOISE ST |
19 |
13 |
0.594 |
13 |
15 |
0 |
46.4% |
72.8 |
72.3 |
13-3 |
6-10 |
|
NEW MEXICO ST |
17 |
15 |
0.531 |
13 |
17 |
1 |
43.3% |
76.3 |
74.4 |
12-4 |
5-11 |
|
IDAHO |
17 |
16 |
0.515 |
14 |
14 |
0 |
50.0% |
65.9 |
65.7 |
13-3 |
4-13 |
|
LOUISIANA TECH |
15 |
18 |
0.455 |
19 |
7 |
0 |
73.1% |
63.3 |
63.1 |
8-4 |
7-14 |
|
SAN JOSE ST |
13 |
17 |
0.433 |
11 |
12 |
1 |
47.8% |
67.5 |
68.0 |
8-7 |
5-10 |
|
HAWAII |
13 |
17 |
0.433 |
14 |
14 |
0 |
50.0% |
64.0 |
65.2 |
11-9 |
2-8 |
|
FRESNO ST |
13 |
21 |
0.382 |
13 |
15 |
2 |
46.4% |
67.6 |
69.8 |
9-8 |
4-13 |
|
|
Current Injuries |
|
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last 20 Games for the 2008-2009 Season |
| Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
|
March 2009 |
|
3-18-09 |
at STANFORD |
+14 |
149 |
76-96 |
L |
L |
Ov |
50.0% |
22.7% |
62.5% |
34 |
53.5% |
38.1% |
85.7% |
33 |
|
3-12-09 |
vs NEW MEXICO ST |
-1 |
156.5 |
70-80 |
L |
L |
Un |
41.5% |
36.8% |
65.5% |
37 |
43.9% |
38.1% |
56.0% |
40 |
|
3-7-09 |
vs NEVADA |
-1.5 |
144 |
60-69 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.0% |
21.1% |
84.2% |
38 |
39.1% |
27.8% |
73.7% |
38 |
|
3-5-09 |
vs FRESNO ST |
-7.5 |
146 |
79-65 |
W |
W |
Un |
55.0% |
31.3% |
66.7% |
32 |
44.6% |
25.0% |
58.8% |
29 |
|
3-2-09 |
at NEW MEXICO ST |
+6 |
156.5 |
104-92 |
W |
W |
Ov |
54.1% |
38.1% |
76.2% |
36 |
50.0% |
29.2% |
83.3% |
34 |
|
February 2009 |
|
2-28-09 |
at LOUISIANA TECH |
+3.5 |
133 |
62-76 |
L |
L |
Ov |
44.0% |
29.4% |
68.4% |
33 |
47.9% |
57.1% |
71.0% |
28 |
|
2-21-09 |
at PORTLAND ST |
+7.5 |
147 |
81-93 |
L |
L |
Ov |
54.1% |
31.6% |
81.8% |
27 |
58.2% |
46.7% |
93.8% |
25 |
|
2-18-09 |
vs IDAHO |
-6 |
138.5 |
54-56 |
L |
L |
Un |
42.6% |
25.0% |
50.0% |
31 |
41.2% |
20.0% |
70.6% |
32 |
|
2-14-09 |
vs UTAH ST |
+4.5 |
136.5 |
66-56 |
W |
W |
Un |
41.8% |
27.8% |
75.0% |
32 |
36.5% |
33.3% |
61.9% |
38 |
|
2-9-09 |
at FRESNO ST |
PK |
143.5 |
82-88 |
L |
L |
Ov |
47.2% |
33.3% |
70.0% |
37 |
51.9% |
35.7% |
87.1% |
34 |
|
2-7-09 |
at SAN JOSE ST |
+4.5 |
139 |
89-83 |
W |
W |
Ov |
57.1% |
50.0% |
63.6% |
31 |
51.7% |
41.7% |
61.5% |
35 |
|
2-1-09 |
at HOUSTN BAPTIST |
NL |
NL |
85-64 |
W |
- |
- |
55.4% |
45.0% |
66.7% |
35 |
45.6% |
30.0% |
54.5% |
30 |
|
January 2009 |
|
1-29-09 |
at IDAHO |
+4.5 |
134.5 |
59-63 |
L |
W |
Un |
36.8% |
29.2% |
62.5% |
43 |
47.1% |
30.8% |
44.0% |
32 |
|
1-24-09 |
vs LOUISIANA TECH |
-8.5 |
133 |
58-53 |
W |
L |
Un |
43.4% |
27.8% |
63.6% |
27 |
55.3% |
36.4% |
53.8% |
23 |
|
1-22-09 |
vs NEW MEXICO ST |
-1.5 |
153.5 |
87-84 |
W |
W |
Ov |
47.6% |
34.8% |
73.1% |
32 |
41.3% |
31.8% |
83.3% |
45 |
|
1-17-09 |
at UTAH ST |
+13.5 |
136 |
65-79 |
L |
L |
Ov |
44.0% |
35.7% |
80.0% |
29 |
50.0% |
37.5% |
77.8% |
31 |
|
1-15-09 |
at NEVADA |
+8.5 |
141 |
63-77 |
L |
L |
Un |
42.6% |
42.9% |
50.0% |
37 |
42.9% |
20.0% |
66.7% |
43 |
|
1-10-09 |
vs HAWAII |
-9.5 |
136 |
54-49 |
W |
L |
Un |
34.6% |
31.3% |
65.0% |
33 |
33.3% |
30.0% |
60.9% |
36 |
|
1-8-09 |
vs SAN JOSE ST |
-3 |
145 |
84-64 |
W |
W |
Ov |
54.0% |
44.4% |
57.1% |
32 |
36.2% |
27.3% |
66.7% |
39 |
|
1-3-09 |
at HAWAII |
+4 |
142 |
70-58 |
W |
W |
Un |
50.0% |
53.8% |
77.8% |
35 |
35.7% |
27.3% |
50.0% |
41 |
|
|
Game Situation Report for the 2008-2009 Season Season |
|
32 |
19-13 (59.4%) |
13-15-0 (46.4%) |
15-13-0 |
53.6% |
46.4% |
72.8 |
72.3 |
+0.4 |
|
16 |
13-3 (81.3%) |
8-6-0 (57.1%) |
6-8-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
73.4 |
66.0 |
+7.4 |
|
15 |
6-9 (40.0%) |
5-8-0 (38.5%) |
9-4-0 |
69.2% |
30.8% |
72.3 |
78.6 |
-6.3 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.0 |
80.0 |
-10.0 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
70.0 |
80.0 |
-10.0 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
76.0 |
96.0 |
-20.0 |
|
17 |
9-8 (52.9%) |
8-9-0 (47.1%) |
7-10-0 |
41.2% |
58.8% |
70.9 |
70.1 |
+0.8 |
|
15 |
10-5 (66.7%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
8-3-0 |
72.7% |
27.3% |
74.9 |
74.9 |
0.0 |
|
14 |
10-4 (71.4%) |
7-7-0 (50.0%) |
6-8-0 |
42.9% |
57.1% |
72.6 |
68.1 |
+4.5 |
|
13 |
5-8 (38.5%) |
6-7-0 (46.2%) |
8-5-0 |
61.5% |
38.5% |
70.6 |
78.5 |
-7.9 |
|
13 |
10-3 (76.9%) |
7-6-0 (53.8%) |
6-7-0 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
72.8 |
67.2 |
+5.6 |
|
1 |
1-0 (100.0%) |
1-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
66.0 |
56.0 |
+10.0 |
|
12 |
4-8 (33.3%) |
5-7-0 (41.7%) |
8-4-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
71.0 |
80.4 |
-9.4 |
|
8 |
5-3 (62.5%) |
3-5-0 (37.5%) |
4-4-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
71.5 |
70.4 |
+1.1 |
|
6 |
3-3 (50.0%) |
2-3-0 (40.0%) |
3-2-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
76.3 |
76.5 |
-0.2 |
|
18 |
11-7 (61.1%) |
8-7-0 (53.3%) |
8-7-0 |
53.3% |
46.7% |
72.2 |
71.8 |
+0.3 |
|
19 |
12-7 (63.2%) |
9-9-0 (50.0%) |
7-11-0 |
38.9% |
61.1% |
68.4 |
68.5 |
-0.2 |
|
12 |
6-6 (50.0%) |
4-6-0 (40.0%) |
8-2-0 |
80.0% |
20.0% |
77.5 |
78.8 |
-1.3 |
|
13 |
9-4 (69.2%) |
5-6-0 (45.5%) |
3-8-0 |
27.3% |
72.7% |
67.3 |
63.7 |
+3.6 |
|
14 |
6-8 (42.9%) |
6-7-0 (46.2%) |
9-4-0 |
69.2% |
30.8% |
75.1 |
78.4 |
-3.2 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
