| Important Message - Daily Racing Form/Affinity Gaming will be permanently shutting down StatFox on 6/30/2024. |
| Valued StatFox Customers: We are thrilled to refer you to our friends at StatSharp, launching just in time for the 2024 football season! As StatFox closes its doors, we encourage you to bookmark www.statsharp.com and stay tuned for their launch. StatSharp's cutting-edge platform will offer power ratings, game simulations, betting systems, in-depth trends for teams and player, and much more to elevate your sports betting experience. Discover the advanced insights and analytics at StatSharp, with even more precision and innovation.
|
|
The Leader In Sports Handicapping
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
SMU - |
|
|
| Last 20 Games for the 2002-2003 Season |
| Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
|
March 2003 |
|
3-14-03 |
vs NEVADA |
+2.5 |
147 |
66-81 |
L |
L |
P |
41.8% |
11.1% |
69.2% |
36 |
47.9% |
55.6% |
62.5% |
32 |
|
3-13-03 |
vs BOISE ST |
-4 |
134.5 |
65-58 |
W |
W |
Un |
42.1% |
43.8% |
66.7% |
41 |
35.7% |
30.8% |
76.9% |
33 |
|
3-8-03 |
vs LOUISIANA TECH |
-6.5 |
NL |
84-61 |
W |
W |
- |
56.1% |
44.0% |
60.0% |
35 |
36.4% |
29.4% |
72.7% |
30 |
|
3-1-03 |
at UTEP |
-6.5 |
NL |
65-43 |
W |
W |
- |
43.4% |
31.8% |
63.2% |
42 |
30.0% |
20.0% |
64.3% |
32 |
|
February 2003 |
|
2-27-03 |
at BOISE ST |
+1.5 |
NL |
66-58 |
W |
W |
- |
51.1% |
57.1% |
63.2% |
33 |
36.1% |
26.7% |
60.0% |
33 |
|
2-22-03 |
vs RICE |
-4 |
NL |
73-63 |
W |
W |
- |
43.8% |
20.0% |
73.7% |
26 |
44.9% |
25.0% |
76.2% |
33 |
|
2-19-03 |
vs TULSA |
+1.5 |
NL |
70-77 |
L |
L |
- |
38.7% |
36.4% |
63.6% |
43 |
44.8% |
56.5% |
100.0% |
36 |
|
2-15-03 |
at FRESNO ST |
+7.5 |
NL |
56-76 |
L |
L |
- |
36.7% |
23.5% |
72.7% |
28 |
53.8% |
50.0% |
90.9% |
30 |
|
2-13-03 |
at NEVADA |
+8 |
NL |
64-82 |
L |
L |
- |
34.7% |
23.8% |
81.8% |
43 |
51.8% |
46.7% |
70.8% |
37 |
|
2-8-03 |
vs HAWAII |
PK |
NL |
78-69 |
W |
W |
- |
48.0% |
28.6% |
86.7% |
36 |
46.6% |
42.1% |
63.6% |
25 |
|
2-6-03 |
vs SAN JOSE ST |
-12.5 |
NL |
82-69 |
W |
W |
- |
57.4% |
45.5% |
62.5% |
36 |
38.7% |
60.0% |
62.5% |
34 |
|
2-1-03 |
vs BOISE ST |
-9 |
NL |
85-88 |
L |
L |
- |
36.9% |
20.0% |
91.7% |
39 |
45.0% |
38.5% |
80.0% |
39 |
|
January 2003 |
|
1-30-03 |
vs UTEP |
-16 |
NL |
80-56 |
W |
W |
- |
42.2% |
41.7% |
69.6% |
35 |
44.2% |
30.8% |
60.0% |
35 |
|
1-25-03 |
at TULSA |
+12.5 |
NL |
86-84 |
W |
W |
- |
39.7% |
33.3% |
77.8% |
50 |
40.6% |
22.2% |
69.0% |
41 |
|
1-23-03 |
at RICE |
+7.5 |
NL |
89-83 |
W |
W |
- |
54.4% |
41.7% |
91.7% |
30 |
45.1% |
45.0% |
100.0% |
37 |
|
1-18-03 |
vs NEVADA |
-1 |
NL |
86-76 |
W |
W |
- |
43.8% |
27.3% |
73.0% |
49 |
38.8% |
40.7% |
59.1% |
41 |
|
1-16-03 |
vs FRESNO ST |
PK |
NL |
73-75 |
L |
L |
- |
38.6% |
31.6% |
79.3% |
34 |
50.8% |
45.0% |
31.6% |
42 |
|
1-11-03 |
at SAN JOSE ST |
-4 |
NL |
79-72 |
W |
W |
- |
52.8% |
52.9% |
60.9% |
40 |
38.7% |
26.9% |
53.8% |
37 |
|
1-9-03 |
at HAWAII |
+11 |
NL |
55-72 |
L |
L |
- |
40.0% |
26.7% |
64.7% |
27 |
46.6% |
23.5% |
82.4% |
36 |
|
1-4-03 |
at LOUISIANA TECH |
+6.5 |
NL |
77-89 |
L |
L |
- |
36.4% |
27.3% |
69.7% |
40 |
45.5% |
35.7% |
72.7% |
47 |
|
|
Game Situation Report for the 2002-2003 Season Season |
|
30 |
17-13 (56.7%) |
16-12-0 (57.1%) |
1-2-1 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
72.8 |
72.8 |
0.0 |
|
13 |
10-3 (76.9%) |
9-4-0 (69.2%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.0 |
71.8 |
+8.2 |
|
14 |
5-9 (35.7%) |
6-7-0 (46.2%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
67.9 |
75.0 |
-7.1 |
|
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-1 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
65.0 |
67.3 |
-2.3 |
|
2 |
1-1 (50.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
0-1-1 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
65.5 |
69.5 |
-4.0 |
|
30 |
17-13 (56.7%) |
16-12-0 (57.1%) |
1-2-1 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
72.8 |
72.8 |
0.0 |
|
13 |
12-1 (92.3%) |
11-2-0 (84.6%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
79.1 |
68.1 |
+11.0 |
|
13 |
3-10 (23.1%) |
4-9-0 (30.8%) |
1-1-1 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
67.7 |
78.3 |
-10.6 |
|
10 |
9-1 (90.0%) |
8-2-0 (80.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
81.9 |
71.2 |
+10.7 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.0 |
77.0 |
-7.0 |
|
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
72.0 |
57.5 |
+14.5 |
|
11 |
3-8 (27.3%) |
4-7-0 (36.4%) |
1-1-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
67.6 |
78.2 |
-10.5 |
|
2 |
0-2 (0.0%) |
1-1-0 (50.0%) |
1-0-1 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
72.0 |
80.0 |
-8.0 |
|
10 |
5-5 (50.0%) |
5-5-0 (50.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
73.6 |
76.1 |
-2.5 |
|
2 |
2-0 (100.0%) |
2-0-0 (100.0%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
80.5 |
69.0 |
+11.5 |
|
16 |
10-6 (62.5%) |
8-6-0 (57.1%) |
0-2-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.5 |
70.4 |
+1.1 |
|
17 |
9-8 (52.9%) |
9-6-0 (60.0%) |
1-1-1 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
73.0 |
71.8 |
+1.2 |
|
12 |
7-5 (58.3%) |
7-5-0 (58.3%) |
0-1-0 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
71.4 |
73.3 |
-1.9 |
|
16 |
10-6 (62.5%) |
9-5-0 (64.3%) |
0-1-1 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
74.5 |
71.7 |
+2.8 |
|
11 |
6-5 (54.5%) |
6-5-0 (54.5%) |
0-0-0 |
|
|
70.8 |
72.9 |
-2.1 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
